Jenkins has Long and your brother from another mother Quinn. Come on man.
Quinn is a beast. But he doesn't make up the entire front seven! Again, people like to masturbating on stats that are soooo subjective (especially for DBs. Other than offensive lineman, corners are the most difficult borderline impossible position to grade based on stats). Yet we have a whole bunch of homie the clowns type characters on this board masturbating to their PFF's stats as if it really is relevant when looking at the entire picture.
Jenkins is much better than Culliver. Can you imagine what he'd do if he had a front seven such as ours.
Rumor has it Domenik Hixon has Leprosy, and Ebola. That explains the reason Cully couldn't get close to him and did not want to touch him.
You're in the New York area, right? How many times have you seen Culliver this year? Is it possible that one of the only times you've seen him is when they played the Giants and was responsible for 4 receptions for 78 yards? Roughly how much of that game, if you saw it at all, makes up your overall opinion of him this year? I'm not bringing up the comparisons to Jenkins in any of this right now. I'm just trying to see what's going on with you and this Culliver thing.
The only reason people are posting negative stuff about Jenkins because you, Dodub, and Sick have all already concluded that he should've been the pick in the first round. And you guys said it every week for the first few weeks.
So because I live in you assumed I don't 9ers games? I'm not quite sure why would you even asked that question. Put it simply, I have not missed one of our games this year, if that makes you feel better.
My last post, as I said, didn't have anything to do with Jenkins. However, I was just thinking about Jenkins and felt bad because when I posted all that stuff on him the last couple days I think I forgot to include the percentage of snaps both men (Jenkins, Culliver) have played this year.
I think most know that Jenkins sees more playing time than Culliver does so that kind of throws off the snap counts, among other things, obviously, but I still feel the need to acknowledge that because I'm aware of it myself and I don't think I said it before.
Jenkins has dropped into coverage 324 times so far (avg of 40.5 times/game).
Culliver has dropped into coverage 246 times so far (avg of 30.8 times/game).
Percentage of snaps Jenkins has played in each game: 99, 97, 96, 100, 100, 98, 100, 94.
Percentage of snaps Culliver has played in each game: 90, 88, 38, 51, 91, 31, 51, 81.
Jenkins thrown at 61 out of 324 dropbacks into coverage (18.8%).
Culliver thrown at 36 out of 246 dropbacks into coverage (14.6%).
I'm getting into dangerous territory now with these numbers because few things are equal between the two players. They both have different responsibilities in each team's defense and obviously have been forced to line up against different receivers. All those kinds of things.
PFF has really high marks for Patrick Peterson. I think he's gonna be the best CB in the NFL soon.
And that's fact! And your rebuttal is to come up with lame stats to prove something impossible to support/prove. You and Pozz are infatuated with PFF. Lately I've realized that the level of competency in regard to the regs is not what it used to be. You quality of things I see being promoted and advertised over the years have delluded. There's only one competent poster on this board who deserves to be mention and get complimented for being a person that is really intune of what really goes on with PFF stats. This individual tries to be objective and bring out the light to something that is subjective with regards to PFF. He shared his knowledge with you guys but that info didn't sync in. So I'm going to take this opportunity to repost what he had stated...and hopefully that will cause you to think twice when posting garbage from PFF in your pathetic attempts to make it seem as if it's gospel:
I know what Bemular said about PFF and I agree that it should not be used as a be all, end all tool, nor do I think it has absolutely no value either like some people think. I know the shortcomings and deficiencies that site has because they, like just about everybody else, are not in the know when it comes to understanding each team's scheme, intent, etc.. I have not made it the be all, end all in my arguments and say almost every single time that it doesn't paint a complete picture.
I have not used PFF as my lone tool, nor do I ever, in trying to get an accurate picture on Jenkins or any other player either. I have posted numerous tidibts, quotes, facts, and transcripts from Rams and 49ers coaches who have talked about both players. I have yet to find anything that suggests anything close to the argument you're still trying to make on both players, though? I'd love to read anything that might make me change my mind right now, though? If anybody can show me anything or try explaining anything to me that would make me think about it harder I'd love to hear it.
I do get the emotional part of it, too. You have always liked Jenkins and said for a very long time that he would be this, he would be that, he would be worth this, he would be better than so and so, etc.. I'm sure you've seen things that make you think he can still be this or that and maybe he can be. It's very, very early. I get all that. I just don't get how anybody can say that Jenkins > Culliver right now. I'd love to be challenged and be able to see something that might change my mind if something credible is out there.
I know what Bemular said about PFF and I agree that it should not be used as a be all, end all tool, nor do I think it has absolutely no value either like some people think. I know the shortcomings and deficiencies that site has because they, like just about everybody else, are not in the know when it comes to understanding each team's scheme, intent, etc.. I have not made it the be all, end all in my arguments and say almost every single time that it doesn't paint a complete picture.
I have not used PFF as my lone tool, nor do I ever, in trying to get an accurate picture on Jenkins or any other player either. I have posted numerous tidibts, quotes, facts, and transcripts from Rams and 49ers coaches who have talked about both players. I have yet to find anything that suggests anything close to the argument you're still trying to make on both players, though? I'd love to read anything that might make me change my mind right now, though? If anybody can show me anything or try explaining anything to me that would make me think about it harder I'd love to hear it.
I do get the emotional part of it, too. You have always liked Jenkins and said for a very long time that he would be this, he would be that, he would be worth this, he would be better than so and so, etc.. I'm sure you've seen things that make you think he can still be this or that and maybe he can be. It's very, very early. I get all that. I just don't get how anybody can say that Jenkins > Culliver right now. I'd love to be challenged and be able to see something that might change my mind if something credible is out there.
I think he is a stud but those numbers didn't look right. That was written 10/25, so that makes more sense after he had a bad Monday night
See?? Go back to the basic Pozz, and trust your eyes. You don't ALWAYS have to rely on "sources" to form an objective opinion on a person. Seeing is believing, isn't that the old saying. Go back to the basics and afterwards you should rely on secondary sources to form an opinion. I too can post garbage (that's what you have been doing) on Jenkins to make a case for him. Did you ever see me post this bullsh8t before:
Janoris Jenkins and the Top 10 Steals from the 2012 NFL Draft | Bleacher Report
No, because it is a moot point. Why because seeing is believing. The steal of the draft to me was and still is Andrew Luck followed by Griffin. I don't go around pasting any bs article hyping up Jenkins, b/c these same writers were the ones bashing him back when he was invited to participate in the senior bowl.
Bingo, you are coming across like an absolute douche bag in this thread. All the numbers favour Culliver, but you're just going to ignore them. We aren't looking at stats PFF made up. We're looking at stats like completion percentage allowed, QB rating allowed, TDs allowed, yards allowed.
Saying Jenkins is better than Culliver this year is the equivalent of saying Alex Smith was better than Aaron Rodgers last year. Ignore all the stats. They don't mean anything. One raging lunatic says so.