Schmoopy1000
When all else fails, Smack em' in the Mouth!
so if Tom Brady played with Emmitt Smith who hogged all the TDs, he would suddenly not be a good QB because of his ratio?No when they won it was because Aikman wasn't shitty enough to fuck it up and when they lost it was because he wasn't great enough to elevate them. In other words he was mediocre for his era . Dude had a 1.1 to 1 TD to INT rate, 61% completion , averaged 3k yards per year, went 94-71 as a starter and lost more close games than he won . He also happened to play 5 of his 12 years with the best collection of talent possibly ever assembled . And still those are his numbers . I'm all g or giving guys props for winning rings but none of those rings were because of Aikman . None