4down20
Quit checking me out.
A team with two quaterbacks has no quarterback. But a conference with six contenders has SIX DOMINANT TEAMS!
6 isn't even all the top25 teams of the conference.
A team with two quaterbacks has no quarterback. But a conference with six contenders has SIX DOMINANT TEAMS!
I prefer to see a few snaps before I crown any team (especially when the only "data" are BS polls that are designed to sell magazines and cable subscriptions.)6 isn't even all the top25 teams of the conference.
I prefer to see a few snaps before I crown any team (especially when the only "data" are BS polls that are designed to sell magazines and cable subscriptions.)
I'm a scientist. I prefer to work real data rather than idle speculation by biased observers. As of this point, there have been 5 college football games actually played. And not a single SEC team is to be found in the top ten!Well, you are on a college football forum during the offseason, I think you'll just have to deal with it. It's kind of what we do.
Denny Greene if you want to crown them - Bing VideosI'm a scientist. I prefer to work real data rather than idle speculation by biased observers. As of this point, there have been 5 college football games actually played. And not a single SEC team is to be found in the top ten!
TFS - 2.2
Rank School Record Conf. Div. Rating Schedule
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
. 1) Waldorf ( 1 - 0) NStarAA NAIA 115.500 84.500
. 2) Montana-Western ( 1 - 0) Frontier NAIA 112.500 87.500
. 3) Eastern Oregon ( 1 - 0) Frontier NAIA 112.000 88.000
. 4) Evangel ( 1 - 0) HeartAm NAIA 112.000 88.000
. 5) Eastern Washington ( 1 - 0) BigSky DI-FCS 110.500 89.500
. 6) Sam Houston St ( 0 - 1) SLandC DI-FCS 89.500 110.500
. 7) Menlo ( 0 - 1) Ind-NAIA NAIA 88.000 112.000
. 8) Arizona Christian ( 0 - 1) Ind-NAIA NAIA 88.000 112.000
. 9) Montana Tech ( 0 - 1) Frontier NAIA 87.500 112.500
. 10) Mayville St ( 0 - 1) NStarAA NAIA 84.500 115.500
(That formatting sucks. my bad.)
I'm a scientist. I prefer to work real data rather than idle speculation by biased observers. As of this point, there have been 5 college football games actually played. And not a single SEC team is to be found in the top ten!
TFS - 2.2
Rank School Record Conf. Div. Rating Schedule
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
. 1) Waldorf ( 1 - 0) NStarAA NAIA 115.500 84.500
. 2) Montana-Western ( 1 - 0) Frontier NAIA 112.500 87.500
. 3) Eastern Oregon ( 1 - 0) Frontier NAIA 112.000 88.000
. 4) Evangel ( 1 - 0) HeartAm NAIA 112.000 88.000
. 5) Eastern Washington ( 1 - 0) BigSky DI-FCS 110.500 89.500
. 6) Sam Houston St ( 0 - 1) SLandC DI-FCS 89.500 110.500
. 7) Menlo ( 0 - 1) Ind-NAIA NAIA 88.000 112.000
. 8) Arizona Christian ( 0 - 1) Ind-NAIA NAIA 88.000 112.000
. 9) Montana Tech ( 0 - 1) Frontier NAIA 87.500 112.500
. 10) Mayville St ( 0 - 1) NStarAA NAIA 84.500 115.500
(That formatting sucks. my bad.)
Explain the bias that 49 non-SEC coaches have in voting SEC teams so high. Thank you.I'm a scientist. I prefer to work real data rather than idle speculation by biased observers. As of this point, there have been 5 college football games actually played. And not a single SEC team is to be found in the top ten!
TFS - 2.2
Rank School Record Conf. Div. Rating Schedule
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
. 1) Waldorf ( 1 - 0) NStarAA NAIA 115.500 84.500
. 2) Montana-Western ( 1 - 0) Frontier NAIA 112.500 87.500
. 3) Eastern Oregon ( 1 - 0) Frontier NAIA 112.000 88.000
. 4) Evangel ( 1 - 0) HeartAm NAIA 112.000 88.000
. 5) Eastern Washington ( 1 - 0) BigSky DI-FCS 110.500 89.500
. 6) Sam Houston St ( 0 - 1) SLandC DI-FCS 89.500 110.500
. 7) Menlo ( 0 - 1) Ind-NAIA NAIA 88.000 112.000
. 8) Arizona Christian ( 0 - 1) Ind-NAIA NAIA 88.000 112.000
. 9) Montana Tech ( 0 - 1) Frontier NAIA 87.500 112.500
. 10) Mayville St ( 0 - 1) NStarAA NAIA 84.500 115.500
(That formatting sucks. my bad.)
Must be that time of the month for you. Title of thread ... Conference Pride. Oops.Once again and read closely (you claim to be a Vandy grad and attorney so this should be very easy to understand): TEAMS WIN TITLES, NOT CONFERENCES......
What an odd thing for you to take the time and energy to write in a comment ...Then go post on sciencehoopla.com? I don't recall anyone forcing you to open and read this stuff. If you don't like it, don't read it. I seriously doubt anyone gives a crap about your data.
What an odd thing for you to take the time and energy to write in a comment ...
I'm pretty sure that it isn't because they have seen them play. Not this year anyway.Explain the bias that 49 non-SEC coaches have in voting SEC teams so high. Thank you.
I'm pretty sure that it isn't because they have seen them play. Not this year anyway.
That is actually information everyone has. I'm sorry you don't get it. Think about and maybe in an hour or two you'll understand what I wrote.Everyone alert the presses, this guy has information nobody else knows!
That is actually information everyone has. I'm sorry you don't get it. Think about and maybe in an hour or two you'll understand what I wrote.![]()
Sure - I remember reading on the bathroom wall once that at the current rate of growth of the homeless population in America, that by the year 2042, EVERY American will be homeless.And even though you are a scientist I'm not sure why this is an issue, as looking at past data to project the future is somewhat pretty common.
Sure - I remember reading on the bathroom wall once that at the current rate of growth of the homeless population in America, that by the year 2042, EVERY American will be homeless.
Now - based on past data, tell me who will suffer a season-changing injury in week two. I'll wait while you analyze the data.
Ess Jay Ess You San Jose State! (hey - they are still tied for first ...)Ok I will settle this MWC MWC MWC