Black Adam
Cowards WILL BE cowards..
Just don't pick Derek Fisher, I love the guy but c'mon.
![10 :10: :10:](/images/smilies/10.gif)
![10 :10: :10:](/images/smilies/10.gif)
![10 :10: :10:](/images/smilies/10.gif)
![10 :10: :10:](/images/smilies/10.gif)
Just don't pick Derek Fisher, I love the guy but c'mon.
and after seeing what LeClown did with Blatt not too keen on him either. if he's that easy to push around we can't use him out here imo...
Difference though, is that this is a young team that is likely to listen to him. It's basically, the type of team he'd have had if Lebron had stayed in Miami. It really wasn't fair to Blatt. He took over a very young team and he and the team were supposed to grow and learn together. When Lebron decided to come back, he was suddenly coaching a title contender and he had no NBA experience.
If he came to the Lakers, he'd have a young team with no Lebron to fuck it up this time.
For staters I do not want any of the following coaches
Brian Shaw, Kurt Rambis, Derek Fisher
My approach is that they would bring in the triangle offense which I believe is to slow for today's NBA and to complicated for these younger players who don't seem to be as smart as the guys like Shaq, Kobe and the others before them
I am not really a fan of Blatt because it was pretty obvious that Cleveland was headed to destruction and the wrong direction. I think the Lakers might want to wait and see what happens with Cleveland though because if they lose, then Lue will get blamed and fired and so far I like his approach to the game better then Blatt.
I have heard, however that the Lakers will most like have a head coach before the Lottery,
From now until they actually announce the new head coach, literally EVERY available coach, or former Laker-turned-coach will be rumoured to be in consideration.
Fisher, Rambis, Shaw, Luke and even Phil were already mentioned.
I'll wait till I hear something from a reliable source!
If Keven Durant doesn't bite on Ollie, then Westbrook the next year might take that bait and the Lakers have been rumored to wanting Whiteside - the problem is Scott set the Lakers back by being the second worst team in the NBA. If the Lakers had improved to 30 to 40 wins - I think free agents coming would have been almost a sure thing, but right now I am concerned that they won't see the Lakers as being readyIf the rumors that Luke is the first option are true, the earliest they can even talk to him would be Thursday (assuming GSW closes out the Rockets on Wednesday). Kerr said he can interview during the playoffs, but only between series.
There are still some interesting options out there too. Cowherd was saying today that Calipari would be perfect and Kevin Ollie is an intriguing possibility as well. Durant seems to really like him and has a ton of respect for him, so it would be interesting to see if hiring Ollie could lure KD.
If Keven Durant doesn't bite on Ollie, then Westbrook the next year might take that bait and the Lakers have been rumored to wanting Whiteside - the problem is Scott set the Lakers back by being the second worst team in the NBA. If the Lakers had improved to 30 to 40 wins - I think free agents coming would have been almost a sure thing, but right now I am concerned that they won't see the Lakers as being ready
Los Angeles Times stretched Jim Buss's self imposed deadline to the following: He will resign if he doesn't bring the team back in three to four years" - So the fix is already getting started for Jim to back away from his promise. That being said and done though - I think he deserves an extra two years to get it reasonable. I always thought that his three years was a little high in expectationIf the Lakers had won 30-40 games, they'd have no shot at keeping the #3 pick. As long as the Lakers don't screw up the coaching hire, they should still be able to attract FA's.
I think the Lakers need to move on and forget about Cleveland's left overs. The name I've been hearing today, however is Kevin Ollie, former coach in college for Durant and Westbrook
Why do the Lakers need to go after a former coach of Lebron's?If the Lakers don't want Blatt, they could go with Paul Silas. (Lebron's first NBA coach)
ive read in a couple different places that you have to worry about that self imposed deadline with Jim Buss. The problem is- if that deadline is a hard deadline and his head is on the chopping block potentially he is going to make moves that are better in the short term but might not necesarily be the best for the long term health of the franchise. I think that if you are really going to give him a chance you need to let him see the rebuild through - or just be done with it-- because if you try and be in the middle it could end up costing the team when the goals of the general manager and the long term planning for the franchise are not in alignment.Los Angeles Times stretched Jim Buss's self imposed deadline to the following: He will resign if he doesn't bring the team back in three to four years" - So the fix is already getting started for Jim to back away from his promise. That being said and done though - I think he deserves an extra two years to get it reasonable. I always thought that his three years was a little high in expectation
Personally I have never bought into the self imposed deadline, but I've also been in the position of working for the children of a business owned by the mom and dad. My personal experience is that it takes a few years for the kids to catch on and make the company what their parents or parent made it and sometimes they are never quite the same. That being said, I really think you have to give the guy a minimum of five years. Consider this - Jerry West and Buss took ten years to bring a championship back to Los Angeles after Magic Johnson retired, so is five years really all that long? It might seem that way, but it really isn'tive read in a couple different places that you have to worry about that self imposed deadline with Jim Buss. The problem is- if that deadline is a hard deadline and his head is on the chopping block potentially he is going to make moves that are better in the short term but might not necesarily be the best for the long term health of the franchise. I think that if you are really going to give him a chance you need to let him see the rebuild through - or just be done with it-- because if you try and be in the middle it could end up costing the team when the goals of the general manager and the long term planning for the franchise are not in alignment.
ive read in a couple different places that you have to worry about that self imposed deadline with Jim Buss. The problem is- if that deadline is a hard deadline and his head is on the chopping block potentially he is going to make moves that are better in the short term but might not necesarily be the best for the long term health of the franchise. I think that if you are really going to give him a chance you need to let him see the rebuild through - or just be done with it-- because if you try and be in the middle it could end up costing the team when the goals of the general manager and the long term planning for the franchise are not in alignment.
Besides that - How many times have you seen some one in their profession, business, job become an expert in a short time. This is the problem with the NBA sometimes. Granted sometimes they need to be fired, but it takes time to develop coaches as well. In time Jeannie and Jim are going to learn how to run the team efficiently. It doesn't happen over night thoughThe deadline is so stupid. It was unrealistic to begin with and it just creating self imposed drama over nothing. Jim and Jeanie should just let it go. Jim should just say "I'm doing what I want" and Jeanie should just say "I don't care about it. I'll fire Jim whenever I feel its warranted" and be done with it. What's the worst that will happen if they reneg on it? Some Twitter butthurt. That's it. Well, that and Magic Johnson using his media friends (like Mike Wilbon and Stephen A) to trash Jim Buss to keep his hands clean.
The deadline is so stupid. It was unrealistic to begin with and it just creating self imposed drama over nothing. Jim and Jeanie should just let it go. Jim should just say "I'm doing what I want" and Jeanie should just say "I don't care about it. I'll fire Jim whenever I feel its warranted" and be done with it. What's the worst that will happen if they reneg on it? Some Twitter butthurt. That's it. Well, that and Magic Johnson using his media friends (like Mike Wilbon and Stephen A) to trash Jim Buss to keep his hands clean.
Jeanie doesn't have the authority to fire Jim.