4down20
Quit checking me out.
You bow down to a guy who once stepped over a player having a seizure. Locking a kid in a shed sounds like the winner in this contest.
Well I have to bow down in order to lick his balls, he's a short person.
You bow down to a guy who once stepped over a player having a seizure. Locking a kid in a shed sounds like the winner in this contest.
I know but but the kids..........I'm still trying to figure out what that question was. I'll answer it as soon as I know
I can count on 1 finger the times I have agreed with SEC honk Booger McFarland but he absolutely nailed this today on ESPN.
"This is 90% about the ACC and SEC not wanting other big programs setting up shop in their back yard and 10% laziness on the part of overpaid coaches who don't want to have to do camps to keep up."
He thinks they should be ashamed.
I can count on 1 finger the times I have agreed with SEC honk Booger McFarland but he absolutely nailed this today on ESPN.
"This is 90% about the ACC and SEC not wanting other big programs setting up shop in their back yard and 10% laziness on the part of overpaid coaches who don't want to have to do camps to keep up."
He thinks they should be ashamed.
It seems there is at least one SEC analyst who will just speak the truth, though I don't agree with the lazy part -- the 90% comment is spot on.
You bow down to a guy who once stepped over a player having a seizure. Locking a kid in a shed sounds like the winner in this contest.
It was less about advantage and more about even playing field. The best recruiting area is down south, everyone knows that. The coaches down south have more access to those areas. The ones up north wanted equal access.Is this fact or opinion? And while you are on the subject of spot on, tell us in your opinion what the reason the B1G coaches wanted to set up shop in the ACC and SEC territories was? All about the kids or to create an advantage for themselves? We will wait on this answer but I already have the 90% answer prepared for you. Lets see if you get it right.
It was less about advantage and more about even playing field. The best recruiting area is down south, everyone knows that. The coaches down south have more access to those areas. The ones up north wanted equal access.
I do think Harbs went full retard with his camps but having equal access is not a bad thing.
It was less about advantage and more about even playing field. The best recruiting area is down south, everyone knows that. The coaches down south have more access to those areas. The ones up north wanted equal access.
I do think Harbs went full retard with his camps but having equal access is not a bad thing.
They have access but its not equal. A kid from Baton Rouge, LA is interested in Bama and Oregon. He can drive to Tuscaloosa on the cheap however it will be a bit more costly to go to Oregon and see their facilities.The reality is that they still have equal access to the recruits, just cant do camps like the three ring circus that Harbs was attempting to do.
A good recruiter will seek out and find the diamonds in the rough.
Sure it was but it was also for recruiting.So it wasn't "for the kids" after all?
Don't you know that things can only have one singular purpose?Sure it was but it was also for recruiting.
They have access but its not equal. A kid from Baton Rouge, LA is interested in Bama and Oregon. He can drive to Tuscaloosa on the cheap however it will be a bit more costly to go to Oregon and see their facilities.
I am with you 100% on Harbs but the ruling is also hurting some of the prospective players.
You'd have to ask the SEC analyst who made the statement. I just agreed with him, as that is my thoughts too.Is this fact or opinion? And while you are on the subject of spot on, tell us in your opinion what the reason the B1G coaches wanted to set up shop in the ACC and SEC territories was? All about the kids or to create an advantage for themselves? We will wait on this answer but I already have the 90% answer prepared for you. Lets see if you get it right.
No. The crying of the SEC and ACC is what prompted the NCAA.The reality of logistics and money has been an issue since time began for football players, this is not a new issue. The fact that Harbs made a three ring circus out of this is what prompted the NCAA to do what it did.
I dont disagree with you at all.The reality of logistics and money has been an issue since time began for football players, this is not a new issue. The fact that Harbs made a three ring circus out of this is what prompted the NCAA to do what it did.