Considering you and Ducky both voted NO in the pole, I'd say two people saud NO.
Yes, for you to say I claimed defense didn't matter was dumb. Well, I might go with a lie as opposed to dumb but you can call yourself a liar or dumb. Your choice.
while I can see the logic in your answer, my issue with voting yes is actually because the Browns are helping him out even more than JUST 2022. Seems like he's going to benefit the same if punished after 2022 when it comes to what the Browns did to help him.Sounds like you need to reread the question & change your vote to yes then.
Thanks for admitting you agree with the rest of us
and once again you still wont say what was wrong with my comment. Maybe 4th time's a charm?
Would add you can vote no but still think the Browns helped out Watson. If you misunderstood my question, once again, I asked who thought the Browns did not help Watson AT ALL.
Go read post 135. The way I read it is the added wording pertains to the issues he's currently involved with.
Because it can help in 2023 is why I voted no to the question...had nothing to do with thinking the Browns are not trying to help him out at all.
But voting no just because it helps in 2023 you voted wrong, since nowhere in the question does it state only 2022.
they can help him out every single year if they wanted to with a restructure, but that wasnt the question.
It's like talking to a brick wall. He's so stubborn he'll never admit it.
I was going by my interpretation of the question. If I misinterpreted the meaning by the one who asked (was it you?) then that person knows best. If I'm wrong so be it.
If I misinterpreted then that's on me I guess. Not how I read it. But the one who asked would know better. Though IMO could have been worded better as the only area they helped him out that I can see is he wont lose his signing bonus and that is not tied only to a 2022 suspension.
Since you mention him I owe him another apology....I should not have credited someone else with his pearl of wisdom that Baker is a bust AND the Browns were foolish not to extend him.
Fair enough. If I'm reading incorrectly I apologize.
I cannot recall what the contract said when it was shown, but other than the mention of the $1.035 base done to help him (which it didn't) I can only recall something about not having to give back any of the signing bonus. I assumed that meant for any season he was suspended which was why I didn't get the reference to 2022 as I'm not sure what was done to help to offer max help in 2022 by the browns.
Just like it reads in the title or heading- Are the Browns helping Watson to escape financial punishment in the event he gets suspended in 2022 ?
think it would have been better written to simply say are they helping him out should he get suspended. Not sure why the 2022 part was needed since the only area he and I ever disagreed about 2022 was the reason behind the low base salary in 2022.
Guess I'd ask why a 2022 reference was needed since the only area I disagreed with you about (which led to you wanting a poll) was the reasoning behind the extremely low base salary.
