- Thread starter
- #1
mind you this group did no testing of the beer itself
This is the equivalent of discovering that Olive Garden doesn't really employ Sicilian chefs in all their restaurants.
This is the equivalent of discovering that Olive Garden doesn't really employ Sicilian chefs in all their restaurants.
This actually is a fairly common practice in brewing. What you do is start off with a ton of high Plato (Specific Gravity) extract from the mash, then blend with water to the appropriate degree Plato. This saves on energy costs because one brew can fill many fermenters instead of brewing with the appropriate Plato and only filling one fermenter.
I can further explain that if it wasn't clear.
I wouldn't consider this "watering down" the beer per se. Don't get me wrong, I'm not standing up for Budweiser, but I think that article is pretty ignorant of actual brewing practices.
This actually is a fairly common practice in brewing. What you do is start off with a ton of high Plato (Specific Gravity) extract from the mash, then blend with water to the appropriate degree Plato. This saves on energy costs because one brew can fill many fermenters instead of brewing with the appropriate Plato and only filling one fermenter.
I can further explain that if it wasn't clear.
I wouldn't consider this "watering down" the beer per se. Don't get me wrong, I'm not standing up for Budweiser, but I think that article is pretty ignorant of actual brewing practices.
The only way this suit will hold up regardless of their practices is if they are sending beer out of the plantwith a lower than advertised ABV. 1.Likely what is happening is that they are sending beer with a slightly higher ABV out of their tank and then adding a small amount of water to get it down to the advertised ABV. 2.Sounds more to me like some scorned former employees.