Alabama has played UT-Chattanooga 3 times since 2008

[TheRobotDevil]

Not one of you Waffle House eating mofos answered this basic math question. Why am I not surprised.

When people need to skew numbers,resort to misdirection,deflections and crying butthurt etc.Its a good indication no one can answer.Because it is indisputable

 

[7Samurai13]

Not one of you Waffle House eating mofos answered this basic math question. Why am I not surprised.

Don't be dissing Waffle House you pancake eating mother fucker.

 

[ralphiewvu]

Better to have your league deep throated by ESPN than have your shit pushed in by every other conference.

Congrats on going 4-2 in your bowl games this year, was looking a little dismal prior to that. I guess when you only send 6 teams and one isn't in the playoffs that's what you can expect. Not that WVU is doing much about that...what are you guys 1-5 in bowl games since joining the conference...good thing you sneaked that 1-pointer out against 6-6 Zona St.

I like WVU, not the conference they play in. That's a huge difference between you and me. Fuck the B12.

Yeah our bowl record is crap, but I'm not the one throwing stones from my glass house about conference treatment.

Ohh an a wins a win, no matter which way ya slice it Sally.

 

[ralphiewvu]

Nope, and I think a two loss Alabama gets in over a 1-loss Washington or WVU.

Shit, a no loss Washington team better hope their wins over whatever amounts to quality on their conference slate aren't close.

You bring up WVU like it hurts me. LOL

Again your raging on other conferences when half your conference is the SECeast????

 

[Rolltide94]

You bring up WVU like it hurts me. LOL

Again your raging on other conferences when half your conference is the SECeast????

So wait...you're not a conference honk...and you don't give a shit about WVU...why are you here again exactly?

 

[Rolltide94]

Not one of you Waffle House eating mofos answered this basic math question. Why am I not surprised.

You're not only jealous of Alabama, you're jealous of Waffle House too...Dick, Waffle House is awesome.

So you're point is that the shittier Pac-12 teams get more losses. Wouldn't the reverse also be true...better teams get more wins.

So, if you were one of the better teams, which clearly Washington was...didn't you guys get the benefit of an extra P5 win in terms of SOS. Lord knows you didn't make the CFP based on your slate of OOC games.

So I guess I'm wondering what exactly it is that you are bitching about...that Cal didn't make a bowl game?

 

[AlaskaGuy]

You're not only jealous of Alabama, you're jealous of Waffle House too...Dick, Waffle House is awesome.

So you're point is that the shittier Pac-12 teams get more losses. Wouldn't the reverse also be true...better teams get more wins.

So, if you were one of the better teams, which clearly Washington was...didn't you guys get the benefit of an extra P5 win in terms of SOS. Lord knows you didn't make the CFP based on your slate of OOC games.

So I guess I'm wondering what exactly it is that you are bitching about...that Cal didn't make a bowl game?

You can't be serious. The reason the no testicle SEC doesn't play their own conference members is because it would mean more losses within the conference. That's not debatable ... it's a mathematical fact. More losses within the conference means less teams get bowl eligible not to mention the hit some of those teams take in the rankings. It also means more home & away series, and less home games playing sisters of the poor in mid November.

 

[Rolltide94]

Don't be dissing Waffle House you pancake eating mother fucker.

Exactly, Waffle House is the shit. Unless you live in Indiana...then Waffle & Steak is the shit, since some shit bird already had the Waffle House name.

Scattered, Covered, Smothered and Chunked please...

Waffle House was one of the things I truly missed living in LA...Not that LA doesn't have some great shitty breakfast spots...Uncle Bill's, Nick's Cafe, The Original Pancake House or my personal favorite...ghetto Hawaiian grub...Gardena Bowl, King's Hawaiian, L&L. Dammit...now I want some Loco Moco and Spam Musubi.

God I love food.

 

[ralphiewvu]

So wait...you're not a conference honk...and you don't give a shit about WVU...why are you here again exactly?

I care deeply for WVU.

But fuck the B12.

I'm here to watch and participate the fun just like you slick.

 

[AlaskaGuy]

I care deeply for WVU.

But fuck the B12.

I'm here to watch and participate the fun just like you slick.

If the Big 12 sucks ass yet WVU kicks ass it might mean WVU's SOS takes a hit not to mention the more bowl games Big 12 teams play in means more money for the conference. The SEC knows this and it's one of the reasons they don't play their own conference members.

 

[7Samurai13]

You can't be serious. The reason the no testicle SEC doesn't play their own conference members is because it would mean more losses within the conference. That's not debatable ... it's a mathematical fact. More losses within the conference means less teams get bowl eligible not to mention the hit some of those teams take in the rankings. It also means more home & away series, and less home games playing sisters of the poor in mid November.

First, the sisters of the poor games would not disappear and you are a fucking moron if you actually believe they would. Pretty sure Oregon and Washington have 9 conference games and have no problem scheduling FCS programs year in and year out.

Last season, three teams in the SEC were bowl eligible because they played an FCS team. Miss State, Vandy, and Kentucky. If your big complaint about FCS games is that it makes teams bowl eligible it shouldn't matter if it's played in September or November. I posted before that the majority of the time, the in conference and out of conference opponent schedules an FCS level opponent the week before as well so there is no competitive advantage gained by playing an FCS opponent in November.

 

[Rolltide94]

You can't be serious. The reason the no testicle SEC doesn't play their own conference members is because it would mean more losses within the conference. That's not debatable ... it's a mathematical fact. More losses within the conference means less teams get bowl eligible not to mention the hit some of those teams take in the rankings. It also means more home & away series, and less home games playing sisters of the poor in mid November.

Again, it means the good teams win more and the shitty teams lose more.

If you care whether Oregon State gets to the Fight Cancer with a Stick Bowl or not, that is important I guess. Although I would argue the reason Oregon St didn't get to a bowl was not their 3-6 conference record, it was there 1-2 non-conference record with the one win against their FCS opponent. Arkansas still would have made a bowl, if they dropped their FCS opponent and lost another conference game to go 3-6 because they won all 4 non-conference games.

The difference here is that you seem to care if Oregon St goes to a bowl and I couldn't give a tiny little mouse fart if Arkansas went to the Belk Bowl or not.

Quite frankly, I could care less if any team, including my own goes to a bowl if they can't win more conference games then they lose. I've never attended a shitty bowl and I'm not going to start now.

 

[7Samurai13]

Again, it means the good teams win more and the shitty teams lose more.

If you care whether Oregon State gets to the Fight Cancer with a Stick Bowl or not, that is important I guess. Although I would argue the reason Oregon St didn't get to a bowl was not their 3-6 conference record, it was there 1-2 non-conference record with the one win against their FCS opponent. Arkansas still would have made a bowl, if they dropped their FCS opponent and lost another conference game to go 3-6 because they won all 4 non-conference games.

The difference here is that you seem to care if Oregon St goes to a bowl and I couldn't give a tiny little mouse fart if Arkansas went to the Belk Bowl or not.

Quite frankly, I could care less if any team, including my own goes to a bowl if they can't win more conference games then they lose. I've never attended a shitty bowl and I'm not going to start now.

Fight Cancer with a Stick Bowl is the best bowl game you grit eating mother fucker.

 

[TheRobotDevil]

First, the sisters of the poor games would not disappear and you are a fucking moron if you actually believe they would. Pretty sure Oregon and Washington have 9 conference games and have no problem scheduling FCS programs year in and year out.

Last season, three teams in the SEC were bowl eligible because they played an FCS team. Miss State, Vandy, and Kentucky. If your big complaint about FCS games is that it makes teams bowl eligible it shouldn't matter if it's played in September or November. I posted before that the majority of the time, the in conference and out of conference opponent schedules an FCS level opponent the week before as well so there is no competitive advantage gained by playing an FCS opponent in November.

How would the November sisters of the poor games not disappear. If the SEC played a 9 game conference schedule? It would be replacing those meaningless games with conference games that impact the entire. Inference. Those games would be gone with the format. And the conference games would result in more losses. While providing a much more accurate measuring stick. Which is why the SEC avoids a 9 game conference schedule. It provides an edge through manipulating the win loss ratios with FCS teams

 

[Rolltide94]

You can't be serious. The reason the no testicle SEC doesn't play their own conference members is because it would mean more losses within the conference. That's not debatable ... it's a mathematical fact. More losses within the conference means less teams get bowl eligible not to mention the hit some of those teams take in the rankings. It also means more home & away series, and less home games playing sisters of the poor in mid November.

The money is also a factor...more home games means more money, we like money and Capitalism here in the South....and we all know how you Patchouli using motherfuckers in the PNW feel about money.

Personally, It is my life long desire to swim around in mountains of my cash Scrooge McDuck style.

 

[Rolltide94]

Fight Cancer with a Stick Bowl is the best bowl game you grit eating mother fucker.

I personally always thought the Poulan Weedeater Independence Bowl had the best name...and I hate grits...apologies to my Southern brethren for that...

 

[Rolltide94]

How would the November sisters of the poor games not disappear. If the SEC played a 9 game conference schedule? It would be replacing those meaningless games with conference games that impact the entire. Inference. Those games would be gone with the format. And the conference games would result in more losses. While providing a much more accurate measuring stick. Which is why the SEC avoids a 9 game conference schedule. It provides an edge through manipulating the win loss ratios with FCS teams

The better teams probably would drop the FCS team...maybe not the teams with in-state non-conference rivals though. The not so good would do what the not so good PAC teams do and schedule the fuck out of them.

 

[7Samurai13]

How would the November sisters of the poor games not disappear. If the SEC played a 9 game conference schedule? It would be replacing those meaningless games with conference games that impact the entire. Inference. Those games would be gone with the format. And the conference games would result in more losses. While providing a much more accurate measuring stick. Which is why the SEC avoids a 9 game conference schedule. It provides an edge through manipulating the win loss ratios with FCS teams

PAC12 and Big12 teams have 9 conference games and the overwhelming majority have no problem scheduling FCS teams so why would the SEC have trouble with it? 30% of the conference already scheduled two quality OOC games against P5 teams. We would be losing Georgia vs Notre Dame not Georgia vs Samford. For the other 70% of the teams we would be losing games against Sunbelt or MACtion games. Those conference games may give a slightly better view of who is better IN conference, but I highly doubt that given the SEC East is runny, hot garbage but we lose valuable data when it comes to who is better when it comes to comparing teams out of conference. If you want to know who is the top four teams for the playoffs we need more out of conference games against P5 opponents, not less, so we have a much better chance because we can compare like opponents. (Yes the transitive property isn't exact but at least it gives us some vision).

 

[TheRobotDevil]

PAC12 and Big12 teams have 9 conference games and the overwhelming majority have no problem scheduling FCS teams so why would the SEC have trouble with it? 30% of the conference already scheduled two quality OOC games against P5 teams. We would be losing Georgia vs Notre Dame not Georgia vs Samford. For the other 70% of the teams we would be losing games against Sunbelt or MACtion games. Those conference games may give a slightly better view of who is better IN conference, but I highly doubt that given the SEC East is runny, hot garbage but we lose valuable data when it comes to who is better when it comes to comparing teams out of conference. If you want to know who is the top four teams for the playoffs we need more out of conference games against P5 opponents, not less, so we have a much better chance because we can compare like opponents. (Yes the transitive property isn't exact but at least it gives us some vision).

No matter how you look at it. With a 9 game conference schedule they would be dropping 1 OOC game. If the decided to schedule two FCS teams as per some of their mo's. They would not only lose SOS from that. But from the additional conference losses through the extra conference game. It's all logic really. And why so many SEC fans fear the 9 game conference schedules

 

[7Samurai13]

No matter how you look at it. With a 9 game conference schedule they would be dropping 1 OOC game. If the decided to schedule two FCS teams as per some of their mo's. They would not only lose SOS from that. But from the additional conference losses through the extra conference game. It's all logic really. And why so many SEC fans fear the 9 game conference schedules

I'd rather see them forced to play two P5 opponents than add another conference game. The last teams I saw schedule two FCS opponents were both in the ACC.