osubuckeye89
Well-Known Member
Why are the Washington fans sucking off the SEC as much as the CFP committe?
Better than Northwester at 22. What would you change?
Miss State is a solid team. They have key OOC wins over Louisiana ,Louisiana Tech and Stephen F AustinNeither should be ranked.
Miss State scored a fucking total of 16 points in their 4 losses. They are clearly a not good team who is maybe a little bit better than the other not good teams theyve played.
You got halfway there, but still managed to avoid answering the question.Neither should be ranked.
Miss State scored a fucking total of 16 points in their 4 losses. They are clearly a not good team who is maybe a little bit better than the other not good teams theyve played.
Miss State is a solid team. They have key OOC wins over Louisiana ,Louisiana Tech and Stephen F Austin
Conference wins over an LSU team thats not impressive imo,Kentucky,Florida and aTm all over rated imo
Let's hope, we wouldn't want you to miss a chance to bitch and moan without offering anything.Who wants to bet that Auburn ends up back in the top 25 this week for beating their joke team (Liberty) just in time to prop Bama up a little more in case of the event of them losing to UGA?
I didn't see any Big 10 teams on that list
Let's hope, we wouldn't want you to miss a chance to bitch and moan without offering anything.
Miss state lost to LSUThey didnt beat LSU. Their best conference win is against a wildly mediocre at best Auburn team.
Miss state lost to LSU
But they beat the Louisiana Ragin Cajuns,Louisiana Tech and Steven A Smith college
Tbh with their OOC theres no reason they should be ranked over some of the G5s not ranked.
But you know rankings are just a scam. Political jockeying teams in position.......To boost the teams they want
I agree not sure how anyone can take the AP,Coaches poll or Committee rankings seriously. The ranking systems are all rooted in bias. The system is riddled with flaws by design.And the SEC enjoys the majority of that boost. If Miss State and Kentucky didnt have that SEC Patch on their jerseys no way either are ranked.
I agree not sure how anyone can take the AP,Coaches poll or Committee rankings seriously. The ranking systems are all rooted in bias. The system is riddled with flaws by design.
Thats possibly the biggest problem with the CFB system. It relies far too heavily on human influence. When relying on the AP,Coches, and a committee. You're adding bias to the equasion. You could say use the computer system. But thats a comparison based on an uneven platform. Too many variables in scheduling. And the fomula is easily skewed by the numbers that are utilized in the formulas. In the end the formulas are written by....humans. This is why I'm for a set scheduling standard. Along with an expanded play off. That works on a 6 game auto bid system. With a fail safe that a CC cant have more than 2 losses or it becomes another WC. Reduce the human influence and increase the the impact of on the games on the field. Could even go 8 if we want to include G5's. As far as people arguing for the flaws in the polls and system. Theres no logic to it especially when the flaws and bias in the rankings are glaring. As watching the propaganda hype they spew on ESPNSome people here will blissfully pretend like there are no clear biases at all though.
I think the NC State and Kentucky comparison is a pretty glaring example.
They both took their 3rd loss.
NC State loses by 4 to a 5-5 Wake Forest team and crashes all the way from 14 out of the top 25.
Kentucky loses by 17 to a also 5-5 Tennessee team and manages to not even fall out of the top 20, only dropping 6 spots.......
Hilarious coming from a Clemson fan. The top 2 teams in the other ACC division. Pitt got destroyed by a average Penn State team and Virginia lost to Indiana.
Conference wins over an LSU team thats not impressive imo,