Kings4OT
Suck my Member
LA, EDM and COL Would be the only teams out west in the hunt that could use a goalie
So crazy thing, supposedly Bruins had a deal in place for Ulmark but was nixed by his ntc....supposedly Ulmark didnt want to go west
Reportedly so, the team involved also wasn't LA.
Ullmark Nixes Trade; Sources List Three Possible Teams
According to ESPN and NHL Network Insider Kevin Weekes, Boston Bruins goalie Linus Ullmark invoked his modified, 16-team no-trade clause a trade to a Western Conference team. As reported here for the last few weeks, the Los Angeles Kings had emerged as the top NHL trade suitor for Ullmark. As of...bostonhockeynow.com
I'd still target Swayman this summer since he will be an RFA. He also went to Arbitration and almost every single Bruin that does - either willingly or team files - over the last 20+ years leaves Boston a short time later, usually within 2 years.
Well they confirmed it wasn't, just wondering who it may have been. I didn't buy that whole thing anyway, Bowlby ain't going to trade his PLD plus assets not even 1 year after acquiring him and giving him a $68 million contract.
I'm sure they kicked the tires but I highly doubt it was ever anything serious although PLD has a NTC I believe that kicks in in June so now would be the time if they were serious but I never believed they were.
Swayman will be a King this summer, book it. I sense Draft Floor blockbuster.
Updated TDL link, better than that ESPN one. No idea what I was thinking posting that POS site.
NHL Trade Tracker - News and Analysis from the NHL Trade Deadline
Stay up to date with all the trades and analysis for the NHL Trade Deadline. TSN's Hockey Insiders bring you the most up-to-date rumours and analysis leading up to the NHL Trade Deadline.www.tsn.ca
Boston finally gives up on Zboril, he was picked 13th overall in 2015 which was the Kings' pick sent to Boston in the Lucic trade. They had numbers 13-15 and basically got DeBrusk out of those 3, reminds me of 2003 when the Kings had three 1st rounders (13, 26, 27) and only Brown turned out.
Tambellini was a complete bust and Boyle had a serviceable yet B6 career. Kings could have had Getzlaf or Perry or maybe both, they completed shanked that draft which is arguably one of the best in NHL history.
What could he really do though? The big move was last summer getting PLD.
This is what they are rolling with into April barring a fall out of the POs, now that the cap doesn't matter getting some guys back will be huge.
I'm glad he stood pat, but you know he was itching to make a deal where he gets hosed.
Starting with the 2001 Draft, you can look back and see that the scouting department Taylor had in place for the Kings (Al Murray) really wasn't up to par on making selections. But 2003-2005, when compared to the overall depth of those specific drafts, looks especially bad.
While the Kings did select Brown @ #13 in 2003, they were pushing hard for Hugh Jessiman, whom the NYR selected at #12. Injuries derailed his career, so Kings got "lucky" by "settling" with Brown. At #26 & #27, this is where their general philosophy at that time failed them. Taylor was apt to selecting NCAA/European players in the first round, due to the ability to wait 4 years to negotiate an Entry Level contract, as opposed to the required 2 year window with players coming out of Canadian Major Junior. Was a too conservative philosophy, imo, as it clearly didn't succeed. Players like Boyle & Tambellini were chosen over players like Perry, Bergeron, and even Loui Eriksson.
2004 Draft was where it looked like the scouting department was bottoming out more or less. That draft class for the Kings was reminiscent of some of the drafts of the 1980s. Nine players were selected, and they played a combined 86 games in the NHL. Tukonen at @#12 only played 5 games, and by the time Deano came along, no other organization was willing to take him off the Kings hands, so he left to go back to Finland.
2005 Draft, the Hockey Gods gave the Kings a major gift, by allowing Kopitar to slide from a projected top 3 pick, to them at #11, all due to organizations being nervous about him coming from Slovenia which hadn't produced any NHL players before. Nevermind he had mostly been playing in Sweden for his underage years. But then, they backed up that selection by taking an overage player that was originally drafted in the 7th round (!) two years prior. Dany Roussin was a linemate of Sidney Crosby in junior, and because of that, had overwhelmingly inflated stats, which clearly was a factor used to justify taking him that high in the draft. Skating was his major flaw, and it proved to be too much for him to overcome.
Now, the one true gem I will give Taylor & Co. grace for drafting, was taking Quick in the 3rd round of that 2005 Draft. But, I still feel strongly that his development was enhanced by the structure that Dean infused into the organization when he came in. His philosophy of focusing on goaltending & defense as priorities when building a team, put more focus on developing those players as the strength of the club.This provided Quick the right type of voices surrounding him to cultivate his abilities and grow him into the franchise goalie the organization never had before.
This, in comparision to Blake & Taylor focusing more on forwards, and specifically centermen, have not proven to be a reliable direction of drafting to build a pipeline of youth, imo. Hopefully, AEG will come to the realization of this seemingly failed path, and send Blake packing at the end of the year. Blake clearly doesn't have the ability to analyze players correctly, and it has forced the organization to regress back to the era of them being constant middle of the pack organization. You can get by with picking the "best player available" in the first rounds, but the 2nd & 3rd rounds are where true abilities to balance your teams out with quality character players shine through. Blake's track record of selections in these rounds have not solidified the farm system, and caused them to hang on to players for too long (JAD, Thomas, Fagemo), when they should have been regular contributors by now, or at the very least, traded. Glaring (imo) examples, showing that Blake is over his head.
Kings not to revamp the development department as much as they need to revamp the scouting departments.
Speaking of Anson Carter. Wants to bring a team back to Atlanta