Why? It's basically a league trend for anybody who is decent. Flacco's was the highest at one point and he's not exactly elite.
Some are getting record breaking contract, but trust me, the offers didn't start at record breaking, that's just where they arrived when a agreement took place.
OK maybe you watched a different game. The Pats had 227 of their 397 yards in the first half. I didn't look up the exact time Avril went out but I'm sure it wasn't the first play of the 3rd. I seem to remeber it was about half way thru? So actually the vast majority of yards came while Avril was still in the game. The Pats did have about 130 yards in that incredible 4th qtr. Give some credit where credit is due. Unlike the Pats being able to switch Browner to cover Matthews, Seattle just doesn't /didn't have the depth to overcome injuries.
Sure the Seahawks thanks to three HUGE plays at the end of the 3rd and into the 4th ended up with 19 more yards. The Pats held the ball 7 minutes more then the Hawks and the Hawks are a running team. With the number 1 D. Pats were 8-13 on 3rd down. Not sure what you're trying to bring up? It sounds similiar to the Hawks vs. GB game?
Very true and we know what the result was at the 60 minute mark.
Why would he take a backloaded deal? Contracts aren't guarenteed. He'd be foolish to take a backloaded contract. An injury and or a bad season or two and that contract vanishes. Front loaded is probably what he's seeking. That's probably what's holding up the deal.
Yep, the better team lost due to injuries and a bad play call. We sure do all know what happened.
You are so right. That's exactly what happened. Just like the NFCCG right? Oh no that's different. That was all skill. Hawk fans kill me. The Hawks shouldn't have even been in the SB with your logic if it was unbiased.
You know what? Water under the bridge. Going to the SB back to back was pretty amazing, I hoping for three in a row. Good luck with your Pats!
Likewise I'd love to have a rematch. It was a great game. Better for Pat fans but we've been on that side twice already.
Wait, did I ever say they were the better team in the NFCCG? Please go back and show me where I've said that. Love when fuckups put words in my mouth. Why not back it up.
Easy hero, I see your jimmies are still in a wad. It's called a comparison. You made the statement that "the better team lost due to injuries and a bad play call", I compared your silly comment to the outcome of the GB game. It's really not that hard to connect the dots. Take of the # 12 shaped rose colored sunglasses for a minute and you'll be able to see that.
Didn't say it. Never implied it. Don't agree with it.
. Beyond squeaky clean. As opposite of Brady as it gets.
You obviously would rather argue. You came at me with the fuck ups and back it ups.
This thread turned to the SB way before my first post which was about RWs contract. You're right in the sense, I should've never got involved. Way too much hate between a bunch of Hawk fans and a bunch of Pat fans.I mean I get it. You are up on a thread about RW dumping on about the SB (still) because it is making you feel better about all the crow you are having to eat on the Brady threads. Who can blame you really. That's some bad, bitter pill to have to swallow.
Say what you want about RW and his contract, but at least he's not a fucking cheater. No taint on that kid. And I mean really no taint. As in the kid doesn't even bang his GF ffs
My bad. I went back and re-read it. I was wondering why someone would say that
