Shanemansj13
Finger Poppin Dat Pussy
I didn't miss much
I mean, he did just ask a bball question and as usual the Question Coward wouldn't answer, so......
Did I say here? Im sorry I misspoke then. I was saying that 90% of basketball fans who aren’t Cavs fans would say Barnes is further along in his development. It seems like @DJ and @Wamu are on your side so maybe I’m wrong considering you have Red Auerbach and John Wooden on your side of the argument.
"The only thing worse than being talked about, is not being talked about." - Oscar WildeYou know what they say, it doesn’t matter if it’s good or bad as long as they are talking about you.
Don't be mad that Barnes had a breakout season on a garbage Raps team that won 25 games.Did I say here? Im sorry I misspoke then. I was saying that 90% of basketball fans who aren’t Cavs fans would say Barnes is further along in his development. It seems like @DJ and @Wamu are on your side so maybe I’m wrong considering you have Red Auerbach and John Wooden on your side of the argument.
Might be wrong, but so far not sure anyone here thinks it's some no brainer to think Barnes is the better player and you have certainly offered no facts to support your case (while using factually incorrect comments and ignoring the facts that refute your opinions).Did I say here? Im sorry I misspoke then. I was saying that 90% of basketball fans who aren’t Cavs fans would say Barnes is further along in his development. It seems like @DJ and @Wamu are on your side so maybe I’m wrong considering you have Red Auerbach and John Wooden on your side of the argument.
This is awesome! I don’t even have to make arguments to enhance my point anymore. I just have to give you guys enough rope to hang yourself.Don't be mad that Barnes had a breakout season on a garbage Raps team that won 25 games.
While Mobley is a nice young player on a Cavs team that made the EC semis.
Honestly things would be easier just to always assume anything in Cleveland sucks and just keep the burden of proof on the Clevelanders. For the most part I think they like it that way anyway.Anybody that says I am a Cleveland hater needs to read up....
I feel a little dirty like I need shower though.
He isn't wrongOh my! This guy is a nice young two way wing and he just went up a couple levels on my chart telling Brunson he’s a grifter and a flopper.
I mean, it's pretty obvious (or it should be) if a decent player plays with lesser players he can get more shots and have the ball more.This is awesome! I don’t even have to make arguments to enhance my point anymore. I just have to give you guys enough rope to hang yourself.
All of your “evidence” here is based on team results and not the players themselves.
He does....but some of that will just be on Mobley.Atkinson needs to try and figure out how to get Mobley more involved in the offense.
Some would say the same about Okie-homa. Not me.Honestly things would be easier just to always assume anything in Cleveland sucks and just keep the burden of proof on the Clevelanders. For the most part I think they like it that way anyway.
So we get it you choose the guy that is a top option a bad team that is more inefficient with a higher volume.This is awesome! I don’t even have to make arguments to enhance my point anymore. I just have to give you guys enough rope to hang yourself.
All of your “evidence” here is based on team results and not the players themselves.
Nah.He does....but some of that will just be on Mobley.
Sure I have. Barnes isn’t the defender Mobley is but Barnes is far more evolved offensively as both a scorer and facilitator. Mobley plays too timid and doesn’t assert himself. You just don’t like my argument. You want to do silly things like try and show shots taken their rookie year as some end all be all. Ironically, in their rookie years Barnes was the guy playing with more talent around him and still asserted himself enough to become rookie of the year. The Cavs were a top 4 seed early in Mobley’s rookie year and then faded when Sexton was injured. The Cavs needed someone else to step up with Garland and Mobley didn’t really do that. As the Cavs have added Mitchell LeVert and even ham and eggers like Strus he really hasn’t taken any bigger bite out of the offense.I mean, it's pretty obvious (or it should be) if a decent player plays with lesser players he can get more shots and have the ball more.
Still not sure what evidence you have as so far you have offered no facts and ignored the facts to refute your opinions. To go with your factually incorrect comments.
Once Mobley has the ball it's kind of on him to take the shot. Often he didn't when maybe he could have.Nah.
It's on the HC as well as the 2 PG's you have in your starting lineup....to actually feed him the ball.
But, Mitchell likes to shoot the ball.