dtgold88
Well-Known Member
Not even sure this is correct and depends on Okoro but Cavs have full MLE at least as of now, I'm pretty sure....unless just assuming will go over?
Not even sure this is correct and depends on Okoro but Cavs have full MLE at least as of now, I'm pretty sure....unless just assuming will go over?
Is clear whatever we do better get it right as gonna be tough to make moves when we go into 2nd apron which we will eventually, I think.Isn’t he only a second year guy? I mean it all depends on how much Okoro wants I think they can afford to pay him around $14M and not go into that 2nd apron. A lower salary guy does make sense in a sign-and-trade but a guy with less experience makes less sense.
Why is the bull shit you make up and the hypotheticals you make up always to be valued more than the hypotheticals other posters make up?as I said I do like the guy and am in no way trying to rip him. 2nd best player? Maybe, but even if he's better than Garland, having Garland (along with Mitchell and Allen, too) is going to make those scoring and assist numbers for Barnes go down. I dont think he'd be better or at least more important than Allen if we had Barnes.
FYI, can make very strong case Mitchell has had the 2 best seasons of his career on the Cavs so not sure how much better Barnes makes him.
Hopefully in your hiatus you really have changed and will own you made a factually incorrect comment. Barnes has demanded touches since he entered lineup? Not so sure about that and it certainly did not lead to many more shots than Mobley attempted. as rookies, Mobley took 12 per for 15 ppg and barnes took a whopping 12.6 shots for 15.3 ppg.
FYI, the type of defensive skill Mobley can play - guard 1-5 and an elite defender at 7-0 even on perimeter is as important as nearly any skill in today's NBA. But I'd add he's as good or better in post than Barnes and, sure, because of his height. And as a wing Barnes should be a better 3 point shooter than Mobley. But he's not.
Barnes could help the offense but a downgrade defensively. He is also about 3-4" shorter. Mobley actually has a better looking shot, just needs to develop it.I think Barnes would be an All Star on your team and the 2nd best player. He’s a Swiss Army knife. He would make Garland and Mitchell better. If Barnes were on the Cavs and not Mobley, they’d be in conversation with the Celtics Knicks and Sixers in the East. Barnes isn’t timid the way Mobley is. Mobley doesn’t assert himself. Barnes has been asserting himself since he entered Raptors lineup and demanded touches over guys like Siakam and FVV who were already established in the league.
I don’t think Barnes is a bad defender. I don’t think he’s elite like Mobley though. I think Barnes has transformative offensive game though. I think he makes other guys better with his game. How much of Cavs team defense was Bickerstaff and schemes and how much was it the individual defense of Mobley?Barnes could help the offense but a downgrade defensively. He is also about 3-4" shorter. Mobley actually has a better looking shot, just needs to develop it.
I know Mobley has to develop quite a bit but I think his potential is much higher than Barnes-this is the main reason I choose Mobley.
I can agree Barnes is the overall better player right now. Not sure I believe he would be a greater impact on Cleveland. I think you are vastly underestimating Mobley's defense. I think it almost equals out with Barnes upgrade on offense.
Barnes won rookie of the year with Siakam and FVV still there.It isn't a mystery his numbers jumped up once they started the rebuild. Now he is basically a #1a or 1b option after the Siakam trade. Mobley would have to be more assertive if he was on a bad team.
I don’t think Barnes is a bad defender. I don’t think he’s elite like Mobley though. I think Barnes has transformative offensive game though. I think he makes other guys better with his game. How much of Cavs team defense was Bickerstaff and schemes and how much was it the individual defense of Mobley?
Barnes won rookie of the year with Siakam and FVV still there.
I don’t even know what Barnes numbers are. I’m going by watching both of them on the court. I think Barnes does more things.
Lol how ridiculous
If this plays out this way, it’s arguably one of the dumbest decisions ever made in the NBA.
I think if you watch the games Mobley has instincts that you can't teach...so that is something special.I don’t think Barnes is a bad defender. I don’t think he’s elite like Mobley though. I think Barnes has transformative offensive game though. I think he makes other guys better with his game. How much of Cavs team defense was Bickerstaff and schemes and how much was it the individual defense of Mobley?
Barnes won rookie of the year with Siakam and FVV still there.
I don’t even know what Barnes numbers are. I’m going by watching both of them on the court. I think Barnes does more things.
One extra year and $114M hahaha wtfWow
100 million?
One extra year and $114M hahaha wtf
This is getting to be laughable. If the Lakers can't afford GTJ, how on the frikin planet are they going to afford these two?? Some punkass young sports writer's idea of a story I suppose. See post #5661.
Lakers are reportedly interested in Lauri Markkanen and Wendell Carter Jr.
The Lakers aren't necessarily giving up on pulling off a trade this summer.www.yahoo.com
Wow
100 million?
It’s like leaving $60 million on the table. One is AAV of $39 and the other $54 a gap of $15 million for 4 years.One extra year and $114M hahaha wtf
It’s like leaving $60 million on the table. One is AAV of $39 and the other $54 a gap of $15 million for 4 years.
I almost feel bad for Lakers fans with the click bait they get fed with deals and rumors.You all would have to send out contracts obviously