They will roll with him this season and possibly address trading him in the offseason IMO.Kinda thinking KD might be the safest bet of players on the Nets to NOT be traded, of course Claxton too. I’m not sure what you can get for Simmons…
Wrong Beasley, lol...
They would be basically where they were last year?
Where is @Heatles84......No rule says you can’t have two of them
Answer the question......are you bringing cheesesteaks to Casa DJ at the housewarming party in Henderson, NV this summer?Imagine if the Mavericks simply paid Brunson?
My bad.LOL. I live in New York metro. So bagels and pizza.
Harden already has 4 assists.Who had PJ Tucker with the Sixers first 5 points of the game?
I don’t agree with your position on a few points in your posts on the last few pages.
But, gotta concede on this…
Nets could have called his bluff.
But, would it have been worth it to deal with his shit again next year too?
Probably not.
Yet, you were correct, they could have.
Are all the Grizzlies dumb? Serious question
They aren't interested in signing him to a 4 year deal. No one is. He wouldn't sign the 2 year extension that could have sealed the deal.
In order for the Lakers to be able to trade for him, Westbrook had to be moved. To do that, and get Kyrie, the Lakers would have to include 2 firsts.
You don't give up that much for a 3 month rental. Especially when you already know that you don't intend to give him what he is demanding.
What the Mavs gave up is okay for a possible 3 month rental. Especially when your franchise has never been able to land max level FAs.
Yup. And not hoping that a mentally erratic person will behave and not cause a ton of pointless drama.