cdumler7
Well-Known Member
I've been reading too much recently because there's little else to do. A few of the articles I've been reading were talking specifically about the automatic 5th year option for first round picks in the NFL and that some players have questioned the legality of it because it doesn't apply equally across the board.
Some legal scholars have looked at it very closely and more than a few believe it is discriminatory and it is in direct violation of constitutional law. the NFL directly discriminates against players that are not first round picks.
The league would have a very hard time as would the NFLPA defending it in court because not every first round pick has the 5th year option accepted by every team. Yet throw many players taken in round 2 through 7 have had the franchise tag slapped on them in year four or five??
Every one you can state what you think. I'm just repeating what I've read. I'm not a lawyer or legal expert. But I can see these arguments and I can see them getting before the Supreme Court regardless of a CBA or a handshake and a wink.
But you realize the CBA was put together by a bunch of lawyers right? Both sides have had lawyers look at it and found it written in a way worthy of a vote by both sides. I doubt these high priced lawyers would be willing to take this to their clients if they thought the courts would just throw it out later on for breaking constitutional law.