Stakesarehigh
One day it will all make sense
The Lakers would love to have Love if he had KCP's contract
In place of Davis or to go along with him?There is no way LA wants Love. Just no way.
And I know he could play today.
Hey, just to wade back into the pool of unsubstantiated rumors....
Did you know LeBron was having dinner with Kevin Love the day Kyrie called to apologize?
Lmfao
Yes, the price of his contract is a factor.The Lakers would love to have Love if he had KCP's contract
Did you mean to sign that, "the pot"?There's that douche passive aggressiveness rearing its ugly head again.
It would appear that you are the one who can't tolerate a difference of opinion.
You can't just say agree to disagree?
Before the first half of this Season, Blake Griffin.No doubt....and we already have Porter, Mahimni, Hayward, Noah and many others.
You were the one who said missing games was the issue. Nice deflection though.
Oh, no...Did you mean to sign that, "the pot"?
If you want to tell me they wont get Love because of cost I can buy that, but to say Lebron wouldn't want a player like him is absurd.
Agree.I think LA needs shooting more than houston does.
Let's make it simple....I didn't say that.
But every roster decision in the NBA needs to be viewed through the lens of the players' contract vs. his actual production. That is always implied in this forum.
Love is a good player, but not an attractive trade asset because he is on a long term contract, has a lot of miles on his tires with an injury history and he is a flawed player because he doesn't defend.
The Cavs aren't getting anything significant back for him unless they take back an even worse contract. Because there are some NBA execs (not all) who view Love's pact as one of the worst 10 contracts in the entire league.
The Lakers would love to have Love if he had KCP's contract
Let's make it simple....
Would you rather have Mike Conley Jr. or Spencer Dinwiddie?
I'm going Spencer for 12 mil per.
I didn't say that.
But every roster decision in the NBA needs to be viewed through the lens of the players' contract vs. his actual production. That is always implied in this forum.
Love is a good player, but not an attractive trade asset because he is on a long term contract, has a lot of miles on his tires with an injury history and he is a flawed player because he doesn't defend.
The Cavs aren't getting anything significant back for him unless they take back an even worse contract. Because there are some NBA execs (not all) who view Love's pact as one of the worst 10 contracts in the entire league.
Shit, the Dubs can make any player a Champion.On a completely different topic for a second you think the Prince of Provo makes it back to the NBA next season? I'm pretty such the Jammin' One has figured out how to play D on the other side of the planet. He could be a real asset for any contender.
#jimmer'sjumpersaregold
Yep, totally different scenario.If he came on the cheap like that, then I'd take that chance...
Shit, the Dubs can make any player a Champion.
So, why not Jimmer?
Hell, maybe the Rockets all give him a look...lol
Seriously, he should stay where he is.
Big fish in a Dixie cup, fuck a pond.
Marbury will never live that down...lolRumor has it that him & Starbury settled their little feud by splitting a box of wine & gobbling down a jar of Vasoline.