- Thread starter
- #23,181
What.
The.
Fuck.
Happened to that kid?
Is it just injuries?
But I don't even think that is true.
Who wins a series between any of the top East teams and OKC or Houston?
The answer is I don't have a clue.
The top teams in the east are right on par with the 2nd tier teams in the West. Don't see much separation there.
Is Boston better than Denver? Probably. At least when they decide to show up.
But after that? Give me 5-10 in the West over anybody else in the East. And 11-13 is probably as good as teams like Charlotte when not tanking.
Lakers shot over 54% from the field tonight- they were on fire shooting the ball- and lost bydouble digits at home to the Pelicans without Anthony Davis- Cheick Diallo went off for shits sake
23 turnovers, and no defense is not a formula to win ball games.
Lakers have an amazing comeback vs. the Rockets- one of their best wins of the season- and then shit the bed in a game like this.
Stop trying to unload Love on other teams, lol. I doubt Love ever makes it through a season the rest of his career. He's beat up and he gonna start declining from here on out. If you're bringing in pairs like that, they'd be far better off signing Boogie this summer and trading for Beal.
But I don't even think that is true.
Who wins a series between any of the top East teams and OKC or Houston?
The answer is I don't have a clue.
The top teams in the east are right on par with the 2nd tier teams in the West. Don't see much separation there.
Is Boston better than Denver? Probably. At least when they decide to show up.
But after that? Give me 5-10 in the West over anybody else in the East. And 11-13 is probably as good as teams like Charlotte when not tanking.
@WiggyRuss is right if we're talking about a healthy Kevin Love. He would bring 3 point shooting, rebounding and he knows how to play alongside Lebron. Getting all 3 of those in 1 player would be a huge help to the Lakers right now.
However, that's essentially the same as saying that CP3 is one of the best point guards in the game when healthy.
It's true, but neither is healthy often enough to be worth the money they are making.
Clipps-Nuggs bet @Mecca?
Once again i dont think anyone said anything about the east from 6-15 lol. Top of the East was great prior to the Oladipo getting hurt
I have no idea where this narrative is coming from. All season long all people would speak about was the top 5 teams in the East
Not a word was said about teams 6-10 being better tha the west teams in that same position
To a degree yes.
Anytime an individual dribbles out the shot clock the way harden does, it is bad basketball. Now, Harden is skilled enough to still make good plays and make it work, but he is minimizing the opportunity for his teammates to play basketball. And that hurts his team because he has some other quality NBA players as teammates.
Same when Russ, Kyrie or anybody else spending too much time pounding the ball into the floor.
The very best teams use ball movement based offenses. Harden needs to play less ISO. Or at least shorten the length of his ISO plays.
I'm good at remembering and mis-rememberi'ng too.....but I don't think anybody on here has said the EC is deep 6-10 or overall..
But why do people assume that 1-4 in the East are better than OKC and Houston?
I don't believe that for a second.
Because the difference in 5-15 in both conferences is so stark that records can't be used as an indicator of which team is better. Top 4 East teams have a much easier schedule.
That is my point and why the strength of the bottom of the conferences matter in this debate.
But you ignore the impact of the much tougher schedule and it's affect on which teams appear to be better today.
You can't simply assume 1-4 in the East are better than 2 and 3 in the West. I honestly don't believe they are.
If I hade to rank teams based on their treat level to GS, OKC has to be 1 or 2.
But you ignore the impact of the much tougher schedule and it's affect on which teams appear to be better today.
You can't simply assume 1-4 in the East are better than 2 and 3 in the West. I honestly don't believe they are.
If I hade to rank teams based on their treat level to GS, OKC has to be 1 or 2.
Hey @ least the worst team in the league right now isn't in the EC. So they have that going for them.
The WC is a helluva lot tougher than the EC. That's why there's 9 teams @ .500 or better right now (Lakers 1 game behind that) compared to the EC's 6 teams.
But why do people assume that 1-4 in the East are better than OKC and Houston?
I don't believe that for a second.
Because the difference in 5-15 in both conferences is so stark that records can't be used as an indicator of which team is better. Top 4 East teams have a much easier schedule.
That is my point and why the strength of the bottom of the conferences matter in this debate.