- Thread starter
- #9,581
Seriously?
You don't want Lebron next summer?
Can't wrap my brain around it, but if that's how ya feel..
all i'll say is the Dubs already proved you can win titles without LeClown...
Well, that is true.
But, the ONLY teams to win championships since 2010 have either had LeBron or been a special group. Spurs and Warriors are both great franchises. It takes true greatness to beat him.
Exactly. If you can get Lebron for 3 for 4 years and make the finals every year during that time period and win 1 or 2 titles then you could careless about him being an attention whore.
Well, that is true.
But, the ONLY teams to win championships since 2010 have either had LeBron or been a special group. Spurs and Warriors are both great franchises. It takes true greatness to beat him.
The one to the far right is Glenn Robinson III
Have no idea who #15 is
....ice cream and symphonies too.
Is that still the case in his mid-thirties though?
How many moves will he try to force through once he gets there by taking only 1 and 1 contracts for maximum leverage? If Lebron was just a player that joined a team it could be that simple, but he joins a team and forces them to redesign the team around his style to his whims.
Winning is great, but also unlikely for the next 2 years or so while the Warriors are at their peak. The Lakers may be smarter to continue to build with younger players that fit their system.
sorry, but i'd rather NOT see my team help that guy's "legacy"...
Me too. Thought shaggy wasn't paying his bills.
Dallas Mavericks?
Really though, isn't that almost always the case? It should take a special group or dominant player to win a title in any given year.
Is that still the case in his mid-thirties though? How many moves will he try to force through once he gets there by taking only 1 and 1 contracts for maximum leverage? If Lebron was just a player that joined a team it could be that simple, but he joins a team and forces them to redesign the team around his style to his whims.
Winning is great, but also unlikely for the next 2 years or so while the Warriors are at their peak. The Lakers may be smarter to continue to build with younger players that fit their system. Re-signing KCP may be a better move than pursuing Paul George to play SG. Does Lebron even want to play PF (where he would essentially fit in LA)? The ideal signing for the Lakers next year would be a modern C more than SFs like George or Lebron, especially if Ingram continues to build as hinted at in his brief summer league appearance.
LeBron moving to Miami has changed the way every star thinks when entering free agency. It used to be that really good teams had a chance. Now you have to be great.