Not sure if serious but the LeBron to LA thing is predicated on Paul George signing there which seems a lock, and LA getting 1 more star to sign there (Carmelo?) or trading for one more star.
What kind of weed?
I went into a Seattle weed shop.
Holy Christ.
What action.
^ This isn't necessarily Boston's or Ainge's fault. Not totally, anyways.
Boston is a big name team, have perhaps the most assets in the NBA, and are in the 2nd tier of teams just behind the 2 or 3 title contenders.
The first question anyone (especially reporters and talking heads) asks in literally any trade scenario is, "Will Boston get in on this?"
Boston can't help that.
I'd further say that the great mass of assets that Boston has collected probably works against them to a certain extent in trade talks... I'd be willing to bet that opposing GM's ask for more than their fair share just because Boston seemingly has so much to give.
I think they win the next 2 for sure (assuming good health). After that Klay can leave, and one year after Dray can leave. I have a feeling both will do so, but obviously happy to be wrong. Depending on what their team looks like if Klay leaves they might still win another. But without Dray AND Klay it would surprise me.
Don't do weed.....no clue.
If the C's have a firm conviction (and perhaps a back channel understanding?) that they will get Hayward... the lack of action on Butler makes a lot more sense.Maybe, but the Wolves got Butler for a ham sandwich.
Celts certainly could have offered more and still had plenty left.
I think this trade possibility would make the most sense. The Celtics send Tyler Zellar, James Young, Amir Johnson & a future 3rd round pick to Indy for PG.
Like I have said many times before MJ's on a level all by himself. There's no reason that this is still a topic. Yet some people have the need to talk about it all the time. No rational NBA fan (notice I said rational so wiggy doesn't count) is still having this discussion. LeBron's chance to even be mentioned in the same sentence w/ MJ was over once his teams lost multiple Finals. A player shouldn't be compared to another that was 6-0 in the Finals & was a 6x Finals MVP.
Lebron can never be Joe Montana.
But, he can be Tom Brady.
There is a legit debate on which of those guys is the GOAT.
I still have Jordan and Montana.
Was is a medical or recreational shop & did you buy any Sticky Icky. If so, what strain(s)?
Not sure if serious but the LeBron to LA thing is predicated on Paul George signing there which seems a lock, and LA getting 1 more star to sign there (Carmelo?) or trading for one more star.
Disagree, if the Cavs had beaten the Ws this year with that superteam I put LeBron equal to MJ. But they didn't, so he's not. But he still has a shot with a couple more titles. MJ was great, best we've seen so far, but he's not God and some day someone will have a legacy comparable even if they are 6-2 in the finals, or even 5-4
If the C's have a firm conviction (and perhaps a back channel understanding?) that they will get Hayward... the lack of action on Butler makes a lot more sense.
It was recreational.
I don't like weed.
People with me bought some gummies and some weed laced beverages.
The people flow was nonstop.
#probgoodinvestment
Boston didn't have to give up any assets to get Hayward, though... getting Hayward leaves open a better possibility that still another move can be made next.Doesn't to me. Butler's on the more cap friendly contract and is a better 2-way player than Heyward.
If they both leave and that scenario plays itself out, I'd have to say that 4 titles in a 5-6 year span will appease the Warriors' fanbase. Hard to really be disgruntled about that.