- Thread starter
- #321
Pattersonca65
Well-Known Member
Yes, he sure didnt last long in Detroit. Pretty much gave him one look like a tryout and they must not have liked what they saw.Are you serious?
Yes, he sure didnt last long in Detroit. Pretty much gave him one look like a tryout and they must not have liked what they saw.Are you serious?
Yes, he sure didnt last long in Detroit. Pretty much gave him one look like a tryout and they must not have liked what they saw.
I don't get how we cut Rush and keep Wilhoite. Makes no sense.
Will Redmond just went to IR. Meet the new boss...same as the old boss.
yeah something we need with lynch out.because we're talking back-ups and Wilhoite is versatile. Rush can only rush, he can't defend run and can't cover at all. Also, they feel Rush was only good against other back-ups, and he won't be as successful against 1's. Again, we're talking about back-ups.
released smelter. another WR bust. baalke might need to go.
That has to be one of the shortest stays for any player in that scenario. I mean....he passed his physical, right? I just can't see a player being so bad that they were cut that quickly even though he was in our organization for a few years.
yeah something we need with lynch out.
I keep Rush. Im sorry but Wilhoite is bad. I would keep Rush.the situational pass rush guy is Carradine, Rush wouldn't get in the games unless Carradine gets hurt too. Just something else to consider, not THE reason for cutting Rush.
So do you keep Rush or four games or try to get someone who'll be a back-up all season?
I keep Rush. Im sorry but Wilhoite is bad. I would keep Rush.
I keep Rush. Im sorry but Wilhoite is bad. I would keep Rush.