Windingmywatch
Well-Known Member
His case has to go down in baseball history as one of the most bizarre mysteries of all time. He sucks for several years and they say that he's got too good of an arm and "potential" stuff to let go. Ok, I can kind of buy that. But he's now been a portrait of complete ineptitude for so many years now that nobody can explain why the Rangers keep bringing him back.
We used to joke that he had blackmail material on JD. I'm really starting to wonder if it's not necessarily a joke after all at this point.
I think we have all been here on this unending Kirkman story that has been going on since basically 2010.
In May 2010 Derek Holland made three sorta almost quality starts ... mopped up the last inning of a loss to KCR and after lasting only an inning against MIN went on the DL. After rehab in the Arizona League he went to OKC putting up 11GS with a 1.87ERA and 1.085WHIP in 62.1IP ... and then was reactivated to TEX in mid August. Stellar turn around.
While those Holland numbers are great at the very same time at OKC Michael Kirkman had 22GS, 131IP, 3.09ERA and 1.397ERA. He was the second winningest pitcher in the PCL with a 13-3 record and his 130SO was third best after he led most of the season in that category going into the end of August.
At the time Holland was recalled in mid August 2010 there was both here (or the old board) debate as to who ought to be brought up. The entire time Kirkman was healthy, mowiing down batters and racking up points as to why he should have been on the ML roster early in 2010 rather than poor Derek Holland who kept getting bounced back and forth by the old field manager from relief to starting to relief.
That point was Michael Kirkman's high point as a TEX pitcher ... 2010 in OKC. This is almost as long as his career has been ... but reason why TEX seems to keep holding on and holding on is 1) they had options up until last year and 2) he was lights out in 2010. Seems like a decade ago.