- Thread starter
- #41
I don't think it's worth it to give up 31 and 34 to go to 8. It seems like we would do better to give up less, to move to 13, get Richardson, then draft a safety at 34.
31 and 34 to move to 8 is a complete steal so moving to 13 wouldn't likely be any cheaper in terms of compensation.
31 and 34 to move to 8 is a complete steal so moving to 13 wouldn't likely be any cheaper in terms of compensation.
That would be frustrating. If it's a big ugly they want, I really, really want it to be Hankins! Richardson's head and make-up concerns me, especially if they trade up for him. Baalke, Baalke, Baalke.
That would be frustrating. If it's a big ugly they want, I really, really want it to be Hankins! Richardson's head and make-up concerns me, especially if they trade up for him. Baalke, Baalke, Baalke.
If we trade up to 8 I would want either Austin or Ansah.
Hey Pozz, do you see Hankins being able to play the 5 technique? I know he was used in a variety of ways in college, but at the next level I see him mainly at the NT - a very good one too. I only ask because it appears that Baalke doesn't value NT that much considering how sparingly they are used these days - it seems like Baalke prefers to develop late round guys for the NT spot and not pay much for the position. I think there is also a chance he falls to the late 2nd...I've even seen him going in the 3rd in some mocks although I highly doubt that scenario.
Anyways, just wanted to see where you project him in our D