- Thread starter
- #1,601
dash
Newly appointed fentanyl czar
The Blues have extended a PTO to BizNasty2.0...
was there a bounty placed?
The Blues have extended a PTO to BizNasty2.0...
But let me ask you, do you think it's fair that Brandon Dubinsky make $1.5 million more than Ryan Johansen? Or Horton $1 million more? This is where RFA deals get shitty to me - guys who have talent and promise are told to prove it, and UFA guys who are known commodities and decent-but-unspectacular at that get to cash in on that because GM's can't help themselves.
I hate making it sound like I'm defending the agent's tactics, because he appears to be one of the more sleazy and deceptive ones out there but I think it says a lot about the unfairness of the system when a guy who might score 80 points next season and compete for the Selke, is valued that much less than a guy who will almost assuredly peak at 50 points and pester Crosby for a few games just because he hasn't played 3 more seasons.
If points are all you look at in valuing a player, it's not fair. But Nathan Horton, albeit an injury risk, has a cup and has a reputation for being a stand up teammate and having a work ethic second to none. Dubinsky gives heart and soul 100% of the time and is a locker room leader, and had just scored the biggest goal in team history (except Foligno one-upped him). Bottom line with those two is the organization stated very clearly what they wanted and those two delivered. And they got paid. Although with Horton it was very front ended, I admit. The team wanted him to lead and he did, he just did from a chair in the locker room more than on the ice. He just got his money up front.
Ryan Johansen is a year removed from being demoted to the AHL and then benched there. So yes, considering Dubinsky and Horton have done what the team wants from them and Johansen has not (not completely yet). The I am okay with paying those two more than him. For now.
And if Johansen wins a Selke (which I think he is capable of) and contributes 80+ points per season for the next two years, I am fine with him getting paid too. Like Bobrovsky, he took a bridge. He has a Vezina and a season where he carried the team on his back to the playoffs. He is going to get paid. PK got paid. I don't get why Johansen's agent seems to think Ryan isn't capable of that.
If points are all you look at in valuing a player, it's not fair. But Nathan Horton, albeit an injury risk, has a cup and has a reputation for being a stand up teammate and having a work ethic second to none. Dubinsky gives heart and soul 100% of the time and is a locker room leader, and had just scored the biggest goal in team history (except Foligno one-upped him). Bottom line with those two is the organization stated very clearly what they wanted and those two delivered. And they got paid. Although with Horton it was very front ended, I admit. The team wanted him to lead and he did, he just did from a chair in the locker room more than on the ice. He just got his money up front.
Ryan Johansen is a year removed from being demoted to the AHL and then benched there. So yes, considering Dubinsky and Horton have done what the team wants from them and Johansen has not (not completely yet). The I am okay with paying those two more than him. For now.
And if Johansen wins a Selke (which I think he is capable of) and contributes 80+ points per season for the next two years, I am fine with him getting paid too. Like Bobrovsky, he took a bridge. He has a Vezina and a season where he carried the team on his back to the playoffs. He is going to get paid. PK got paid. I don't get why Johansen's agent seems to think Ryan isn't capable of that.
So the Dave Bolland deal looks like a good one then? Because that sounds almost exactly like the case for it.
By not wanting to pay him and lock him up don't you think that the team is the one sending the (bad) message that they don't think he's capable of that?
So the Dave Bolland deal looks like a good one then? Because that sounds almost exactly like the case for it.
Not exactly. And UFAs are a different beast than the RyJo situation. I was commenting on what the Jackets were looking for and why they paid Horton more than they offered Johansen. And in the UFA market you have to risk more to get "your guy". Sometimes you get burned. Sometimes you don't. Bolland's contract, and hindsight proves it conclusively, was a mistake. The Jackets are not saying that about Horton. It could well get there if he can't stay healthy, but so far he has given them everything they have asked of him, and the contract does not look like an albatross. The question was, am I okay with them paying Horton 1m more than they offered Johansen. Right now? Yes.
The message is not they think he's incapable. They are saying they will take decent care of him until he proves that the AHL demotion and benching was the fluke. I don't feel that's a bad message. If they thought he was incapable, they would have sent hm to the Rangers. *cough* Brassard *cough*![]()
How about Landeskog as an example to follow? By all accounts his second season was shit. Avs looked past it, inked him to a 7 year deal with an AAV of $5.57 and how little do you think they regret that?
If the kid wants $5.5-6m AAV for 6 years, I think that's a steal.
Neat twist on the age old "have the players give out a few season tickets" thing most teams do. Well done, Ducks.