Stakesarehigh
One day it will all make sense
I love winter football.
Says the guy in cali
I love winter football.
"when you come to Kansas city, homie, better keep your cool cuz...45/50 and sunny isn't winter football. Damn SoCalers.
![]()
so, uhhhh, what's your point...?Says the guy in cali
"when you come to Kansas city, homie, better keep your cool cuz...
WE'RE..!
GONNA...!
BEAT...!
THE...!
HELL OUTTA YOU...!
hehehe...
lol i gotta put a cold weather open stadium on my bucket list....Don't have to tell me about the cold. Been to Browns games at old Municipal Stadium in December. Dumbasses that built it faced the open end of the stadium towards Lake Erie.
Baker had a shaky 2nd season of course- mostly due to the idiot that was Freddie Kitchens and a very poor offensive line--- being in 3 different systems his first 2 years did not help either.@WiggyRuss @dtgold88 @Stakesarehigh Saw an interesting stat, no way am I comparing him to Dan Marino but for all the hate he gets he has been productive. I get he had a bad 2nd season but a ton of turnaround on this coaching staff.
“There’s two guys in the history of the NFL that within their first three seasons have thrown for 25 touchdowns, they’ve thrown for 11,000-plus yards and they’ve had a passer rating of 89 or more: Dan Marino and Baker Mayfield,”
the ACC is definitely a one team league football wise. Of course its amazing at basketball.Anything you can support with facts? Never mind something tells me you wont be consulted no matter where ND moves or does not move.
You were the one who seemed fine with the ACC which is even more about 1 team and little else. Such fertile recruiting ground to be as bad as they are, no? when's the last time FSU or Miami really mattered? A Carolina? Wisconsin - yes, Wisconsin - has probably lapped all of them.
the ACC is definitely a one team league football wise. Of course its amazing at basketball.
But football its a one team league- and that one team is dependent on the coach and does not exactly have a storied history. If/when Dabo leaves, itll be interesting to see if they built the program up to a level where it can still stay nationally relevant or kind of goes back to being a team that really does not have much going for it from a national perspective.
wont argue with the first 3 as I don't really care much about ND history nor their finances...4th, 5th and 6th are opinion.Fact: Fielding Yost was a bigot
Fact: That bigotry created ND the National brand
Fact: ND doesn’t need to attach itself to any conference to pay their bills
Fact: The Rust Belt is dead
Fact: the South grows and the disparity between the quality of HS football in the South vs the Midwest grows each decade
Fact: Notre Dame won’t be joining the Big Ten
Agree really good at basketball, too....though BIG has caught up there.the ACC is definitely a one team league football wise. Of course its amazing at basketball.
But football its a one team league- and that one team is dependent on the coach and does not exactly have a storied history. If/when Dabo leaves, itll be interesting to see if they built the program up to a level where it can still stay nationally relevant or kind of goes back to being a team that really does not have much going for it from a national perspective.
In the way ND Boy was talking it's a 1 team conference. In The Now, none of those teams are even relevant in the CFP picture. "Rich history" hasn't helped any of them lately.Look, I have criticized ACC football plenty. The middle of the conference has been down the past few years.
But, it is more than a 1 team conference.
Miami, Florida St, and VA Tech all have rich football histories.
And let’s not act like the Big 10 is on the same level as the SEC. it just isn’t.
Certainly the 2nd strongest football league in the NCAA right now, but the gap between the SEC and the Big 10 is wider than the gap between the Big 10 and the ACC
Maybe people don’t answer your “direct” questions because they reveal a bias and a desire to deflect. You’re attempting to defeat the KNOWN demographics of college football that clearly shows that there are far more recruits in the South today than in the North. This is a major divergence from the norm some 50-60 years ago. You think that by pointing out the institutional failures in running the football programs at places like Miami and recently FSU that this is somehow evidence that the demographics I speak of don’t exist. It’s flawed reasoning to say the least. Why? Because you forget that the SEC competes in the same region for recruits. You also conveniently don’t point out that your own team no longer leans on Ohio recruiting the way they once did. In OSU’s 2022 class they have 7 commits from below the Mason Dixon line and 4 recruits from their home state. To your Wisconsin Iowa and NW point…some one has to be the tallest midget in the horrid Big Ten West. Additionally, Michigan St died when Dantonio retired. He had Sparty punching above their weight class. Projecting that going forward is questionable at best. I agree that OSU will be fine. They’d be fine in any conference in any situation. That doesn’t mean that the B10’s best days arebehind them.wont argue with the first 3 as I don't really care much about ND history nor their finances...4th, 5th and 6th are opinion.
as to your 5th pearl of wisdom.....With such fertile recruiting in the South, why are so many teams in the ACC not named Clemson from afterthoughts to awful (I ask knowing irrational people like you are not fans of direct questions and likely wont answer...but maybe you surprise me this time?)? How has Wisconsin managed to lap pretty much all of them? Have any been better than even Iowa, Northwestern or MSU on a consistent basis (let alone PSU or - ugh UM)?
FYI, don't really care if ND joins the BIG or not. Just a topic of conversation. My team should be OK, either way.
nah.Look, I have criticized ACC football plenty. The middle of the conference has been down the past few years.
But, it is more than a 1 team conference.
Miami, Florida St, and VA Tech all have rich football histories.
And let’s not act like the Big 10 is on the same level as the SEC. it just isn’t.
Certainly the 2nd strongest football league in the NCAA right now, but the gap between the SEC and the Big 10 is wider than the gap between the Big 10 and the ACC
ehhh- part of that is the coaching philospohies though.Maybe people don’t answer your “direct” questions because they reveal a bias and a desire to deflect. You’re attempting to defeat the KNOWN demographics of college football that clearly shows that there are far more recruits in the South today than in the North. This is a major divergence from the norm some 50-60 years ago. You think that by pointing out the institutional failures in running the football programs at places like Miami and recently FSU that this is somehow evidence that the demographics I speak of don’t exist. It’s flawed reasoning to say the least. Why? Because you forget that the SEC competes in the same region for recruits. You also conveniently don’t point out that your own team no longer leans on Ohio recruiting the way they once did. In OSU’s 2022 class they have 7 commits from below the Mason Dixon line and 4 recruits from their home state. To your Wisconsin Iowa and NW point…some one has to be the tallest midget in the horrid Big Ten West. Additionally, Michigan St died when Dantonio retired. He had Sparty punching above their weight class. Projecting that going forward is questionable at best. I agree that OSU will be fine. They’d be fine in any conference in any situation. That doesn’t mean that the B10’s best days arebehind them.
Do you want to talk next about the foolish decision to add Rutgers and Maryland based on a business model that has quickly become foolish as cable and streaming has evolved before our eyes?
Would also add that as you closed your post you helped me evidence what I said last week. You’re a Fan Boi. You admit that the B10 no looka so good but does it really bother you? No. Cause your team will be just fine.