dtgold88
Well-Known Member
Bull...we still control our own destiny.Too late.
Bull...we still control our own destiny.Too late.
Bull...we still control our own destiny.
clearly it's not. You argued they were not in the game into the 4th when they had the ball down by a score. Did they end up with no shot? Yep.clearly it IS "debatable"...
you can argue the length of the beating all you like. bottom line is the end result...
#thanksforplaying
no doubt about that. And that's the point.Sure, but the timing of those turnovers had a lot to do with that game being over quickly (along with defensive failures).
no doubt about that. And that's the point.
clearly it's not. You argued they were not in the game into the 4th when they had the ball down by a score. Did they end up with no shot? Yep.
#oktoadmitiamclueless
Ever hear me say otherwise about WRs/line? In fact, I just made that same point. I am not a Dorsey apologist or honk. He's made some good or even great moves but unlike many Browns fans, I am aware he has made mistakes.Maybe overspending on WRs and surplus RBs instead of the line wasn't so smart?
To me, a game that is close going into the 4th is different than one where your team was never really in it. All I'm sayin'....but the simularity is that both games were lost due to catastrophic errors, with only the timing of those really changing. Different, but kinda the same too.
I said they were in the game going into 4th and it's not debatable and you claimed it was debatable.huh...?
my only argument was they got STEAMROLLED in both cases...
might wanna lay off the sauce until AFTER you get home from work...
keep going with that sugarcoated spin, though. it seems to be working so well...
I said they were in the game going into 4th and it's not debatable and you claimed it was debatable.
It's not.
That was the question asked.....was the game close into the 4th. I said not debatable. It was close. You disagreed. Unless you think within a score and having the ball is not close you were wrong.i'm debating it...
you're wrong...
who cares how long they were "in it"...?
your turn...
That was the question asked.....was the game close into the 4th. I said not debatable. It was close. You disagreed. Unless you think within a score and having the ball is not close you were wrong.
Oh I get it...you cannot tell the difference in a game where the lead was 2 or more TDs through most of the game with one where the game was in doubt and close in the 4th quarter.dude, just stop already ...
I said they got steamrolled in BOTH cases...
you can argue the point in time of those instances til you're friggin' blue in the face...
I'm not buying, and i doubt anyone else is either...
And last time they faced each other Baker got his.
Sure hasn't quite gone how I'd want it to.
Yeah....that's why I said "it sure hasn't gone how I wanted it to."And when Baker got his, it crushed OSU fans.
I don't know what watching Russell Wilson will help. He's far faster and quicker than Baker. Baker needs to focus on playing more within the pocket, or the OC needs to design rollouts if the line can't hold up. These improvised (or panicked) rollouts really aren't working.
Well I hope they win the preseason championship & nothing else.
Ain't that right @ChiefsLakers67 & @trojanfan12?