Phantom
Well-Known Member
I like the idea. You can never have enough college football.
The logistics of making this happen would be extremely difficult not to mention taking away the opportunity for any major payday would hurt their budgets substantially as well.
I like the idea. You can never have enough college football.
I agree ^^^^^ Plus, these mid majors rarely ever sellout their home games during regular football season, so it really wouldn't matter if the NCAA moved their season to the spring.
I would argue that attendance would increase. I could absolutely see for instance a UAB picking up college football starved Bama and Auburn fans needing to get their fix and heading to a UAB game to take on say ULL. Not all obviously but alot. I know for a fact that there are WVU fans that don't see Marshall as a rival at all that pull for the Herd when they are playing an out of state team.
An early summer Saturday night playoff game between Boise and Southern Miss in the south? You kiddin me? BIG crowds IMO.
I watch softball on the P12 network all the time. Pac-12 softball is second to none plus some of dem chicas got some nice heinies.
There are incoming freshmen that haven't even graduated High School yet. How would they be ready or even able to participate if it starts in March? I like football as much as the next guy, but could never see something like that working.
I'm going to pass for numerous reasons. I don't see any reason to believe that a Northern Illinois-Bowling Green game would be more heavily attended or receive higher ratings if it were in the spring as opposed to the fall. Plus, the more mid-major kids are going to get completely forgotten about by NFL scouts. If their season is in the spring, and they go an entire fall just focusing on Power 5 kids the mid major kids who are good enough will disappear from everyone's consciousness.
?My Avi supports UL-Lafayette.
Well aware, nice combo
The argument against is, would it be a big enough attendance increase to justify such a big change?
The idea does have some merit. However, there are some fairly obvious issues that would have to be worked out.
One of the big one's is as the Boise fan pointed out, what about those mid-majors who would like to move up to BCS level and have shown that they can beat BCS level teams? Part of how they measure themselves and their progress towards moving to BCS level is by playing BCS teams.
Just using Boise as an example, if memory serves, when they first started playing BCS teams, they pretty well got their asses handed to them. But they worked on getting better recruits (likely by grabbing kids that had been passed over by the BCS schools and offering them a chance to play the schools that passed on them), started winning some of those games and even got to BCS bowls. The same could be said for Utah who managed to get themselves into a BCS conference.
Additionally, what do we do with the bowls, especially the lower tier bowls, that take many of these schools that will now be playing in the spring.
Relax. I know it's hard to watch West Virginia in the fall but that doesn't mean we need spring football for you to feel better.
Why in the world would you want to see another Northern Illinois vs Florida Sate game (referencing that BCS game a few years ago)in our playoffs again? Let the little guys play the little guys and keep em out if our big boy world. Let em have their own playoff/ccg/ ect. Their own separate deal. Enough with the "cupcake" games for P5 programs, earn it!
I'm sure you'd want to watch.Just a dirty way to act, perhaps you need a shower...
Utah over Pitt
Utah over Alabama
Boise State over Oklahoma
TCU over Wisconsin
vs
UGA over Hawaii
FSU over Northern Illinois
and while UCF was in the Big East/AAC last season while they still had a bid it was their first year up from CUSA and they won over BIG XII champs Baylor
and we also had a Boise State vs TCU game that if you split it up I think both those teams could have ran with any of the top 10 that season.