BOTSLAYER
You can be anything
Most people in here state that they want their team to beat the best on their path to the Title etc, yet they seem to have no issues with the refs helping them win.
How mature.:rollseyes:
No the Wade 3, where the ref was 2 feet away, should be right 100% of the time. It is an easy call, anyone could make. The travel I could see, but you take one bad call away the Heat win. It doesn't really matter, it would matter more in a playoff game. It is just one meaningless game anyway for the Heat.
Most people in here state that they want their team to beat the best on their path to the Title etc, yet they seem to have no issues with the refs helping them win.
Hi, I'm a Heat fan...refs refs refs, blah blah blah.
No the Wade 3, where the ref was 2 feet away, should be right 100% of the time. It is an easy call, anyone could make. The travel I could see, but you take one bad call away the Heat win. It doesn't really matter, it would matter more in a playoff game. It is just one meaningless game anyway for the Heat.
I am not sure you understand how to use stats to identify inconsistencies. Everything I have stated is an inconsistency or anomaly and none of them went in the favor of MIA. That is the entire point. Had they been split we could say that the refs just sucked, but that wasn't the case. The refs were bias.
MIA shoots 76% from the FT line, 72.4% is far from an anomaly. If MIA shot 76% that would in fact be a total of 22.04 FTs made vs their 21. That would have tied the game but hardly something I would say if only this had happened yada yada yada.
So what you are saying is that if MIA plays better than they normally play they could have beat both IND and the refs?
No I am not.
Even if I was it does not mean I would change because of what other people think. Provide me evidence that I am wrong and we discuss it like we have been. I am not going to change what I think is right based on an opinion based on nothing.
the whole game thread was littered with pacers fans bitching about the refs....
This is hands down the stupidest thing I've read today and maybe ever. The problem isn't my ability to use stats to identify inconsistencies, it's that the stats dispute your desire to blame the refs.
And the Heat didn't play better or even as well as they normally do. That is unless of course, Mario Chalmers usually only shoots 2 for 10 from the field, Bosh usually only shoots 3 for 11 from the field and the Heat usually only shoot 31% from the 3-point line.
Funny how none of the real Heat fans seem to be blaming the refs, it's just you and shane.
What Pacers fans that are regulars on this board were bitching? I sure wasn't. The only other regular Pacers fan here is Blue. Hurricane is hardly ever on.
What Pacers fans that are regulars on this board were bitching? I sure wasn't. The only other regular Pacers fan here is Blue. Hurricane is hardly ever on.
I know you think disagreeing and calling names is intelligent debate but I assure you it is not. Please explain how MIA earning more fouls while in the act of shooting or in the bonus means that the refs were not bias?
MIA is an offensive juggernaut and IND is a handsy physical defense, that is when MIA is going to earn calls.
Meanwhile IND is a pathetic offense and MIA when motivated is a very good non physical defense. IND is not going to be fouled in the act of shooting nearly as often.
Could MIA have played better? Yup. Should MIA have to beat IND and the refs? Nope.
If anything this game backs up every thing I have said all year. If MIA and IND are reffed consistently IND does not stand a chance. MIA got hosed on every call and every body but LBJ and Haslem played like shit and they were with out Ray Allen and they lost by 1.
Yup it was him. It ok for you guys to bitch i guess
They didn't play well and still SHOULD have won the game.
Other than disagreeing with me and FTs taken you have offered nothing to the refs were non bias stance.
They didn't play well and still SHOULD have won the game.
Other than disagreeing with me and FTs taken you have offered nothing to the refs were non bias stance.
I didn't mention Chalmers shooting 2 for 10 or Bosh shooting 3 for 11? I didn't mention Lebron disappearing over the last 2 minutes as the real reasons the Heat lost?
You say I've shown nothing that proves the refs were non-bias, but you have presented no proof that they were biased. You're making the accusation, so the burden of proof is with you.
Meanwhile, the stats that you love so much, tend to support my view.
And you still haven't shown where I called you a name.
You have never been more wrong.
Lance can control not being a douche in between plays, LBJ can't control sprinting to the basket and clipping Hibbert with an elbow.
Scola can avoid winding up and smashing LBJs face when going for a block, quite simply by not smashing.
Mahini does not need to tackle LBJ to stop him from going to the hoop, he has 3 inches and 40 pounds on LBJ or maybe he could make a play for the ball how you are supposed to do and everything else is a flagrant, supposedly, but not if you are playing against LBJ or Griffin.
Wade 3 could have been ruled correctly, maybe even reviewed, neither of which happened.
If 1 of those refs are on the court MIA is 47-27 ATS, as we all know the spread is mainly designed to be a 50-50 proposition. 47-27 is not even close.
Just because you ignore what is written doesn't mean I didn't offer statistical and blatantly obvious evidence to my argument:
Add the West travel call for another 3 points.