wilwhite
Well-Known Member
It was called before the throw.More this. And the fact the ball wasn't catchable
It was called before the throw.More this. And the fact the ball wasn't catchable
and that's total bullshit.He turned to head up field, but apparently that wasn't deemed enough.
I don't acknowledge bullshit rules that conflict with reality. sorry. you live in fantasyland.Tell us you don't understand the catch rules of the NFL without telling us you don't understand the catch rules of the NFL. That was no where close to being a catch, it was one of the easiest calls in the entire game.
You don’t know the rule.and that's total bullshit.
Nope. You don’t know or understand the rule. You have no clue what you’re talking about.I don't acknowledge bullshit rules that conflict with reality. sorry. you live in fantasyland.
So you don't acknowledge rules as they are written. He had two of the three factors that determine a catch, you need all 3. He had two feet down and possession, he did not complete a football move. You are either blind, stupid, or both.I don't acknowledge bullshit rules that conflict with reality. sorry. you live in fantasyland.
It was called before the throw.
It's @PIBuckeye soSo you don't acknowledge rules as they are written. He had two of the three factors that determine a catch, you need all 3. He had two feet down and possession, he did not complete a football move. You are either blind, stupid, or both.
It was at least borderline IMO, much like Goedert's catch. For that catch, I would've liked a freeze frame of when he got control to see if that first foot was still down.and that's total bullshit.
Not to pour salt in the wound to your loss man, but I'm hoping in the next couple days my team will be announcing the hiring of your Offensive Coordinator.Nope. You don’t know or understand the rule. You have no clue what you’re talking about.
Not to pour salt in the wound to your loss man, but I'm hoping in the next couple days my team will be announcing the hiring of your Offensive Coordinator.
I feel the same way. The refs in this game were not as bad as I have seen in past Superbowls. I can't look at this game and say oh that team got hosed and they lost because of the refs.I agreed with all calls against the Eagles and disagreed with all calls that went against the Chiefs.
He’s a great coach. Good luck.Not to pour salt in the wound to your loss man, but I'm hoping in the next couple days my team will be announcing the hiring of your Offensive Coordinator.
Yes. He had to do it, it was in the scriptThe refs usually suck but it's hard to blame the refs when the player admits he made a mistake lol
Eagles CB James Bradberry on crucial third-down penalty: 'It was holding'
I agree with you on your first two but the last one...
He clearly impeded the WR. Would he have made the catch? We'll never know but he would've been a hell of a lot closer. That's why I think it was the right call. It looked awkward. I think it easily knocked him 2 strides of his route.
There was a jersery tug even before the bump, self admitted by the defender. That's why I think it looked so awkward a tug and then the collided.One of the ladies I work said it was a "tap". I said two grown men weighing 200lbs each going full speed don't "tap" each other. It was just enough to mess up his timing route.
I was more pissed that I felt like they weren't calling false starts. And the Chiefs seemed to commit/get away with the bulk of those.
Good game IMHO. First one I've watched in its entirety in a while.
America is raising a bunch of lunk headed conspiracy theorists. I work at an elementary school and whenever the game was brought up I'd have two or three kids scream the "GAME WAS RIGGED! THE REFS LOVE MAHOMES!"... I know they are simply parroting their parents... but still these little paranoid idiots grow up and vote...
There was a jersery tug even before the bump, self admitted by the defender. That's why I think it looked so awkward a tug and then the collided.
God bless you. I wouldn't step close to any school these days.