- Thread starter
- #1
Fencer
Not left-handed either
Rather than simply dropping by to gloat, I thought I'd offer some facts and logic while I was here.
Everybody now knows, or should know:
1. Despite enormous efforts to implicate Brady, there has never been a coherent theory as to how the supposed cheating occurred. For example:
2. ALL evidence of McNally's or Jastremski's involvement in deflation is a few text messages earlier than the 2014-2015 season. But in October, 2014, Brady was furiously telling Jastremski (and by implication McNally) to ensure that the balls were inflated according to the rulebook. There is no possible timeline to connect the very, very few pieces of evidence.
3. McNally or Jastremski could have made a LOT of money selling a confessional story to the tabloids. They didn't do so. This strongly suggests that in fact they had nothing to confess.
And by the way, Jonathan Kraft just said that he's going to ask the league for permission to reinstate them in their jobs. So it's not as if somebody has paid them off to disappear.
Summing up:
Everybody now knows, or should know:
- The NFL's investigation and discipline of Brady were both inept and corrupt.
- Public opinion has been significantly swayed by various NFL lies, and so "gut feels" about Brady's guilt should not be relied on.
1. Despite enormous efforts to implicate Brady, there has never been a coherent theory as to how the supposed cheating occurred. For example:
- Supposedly, a big tip-off to the cheating was an underinflated ball intercepted in Indianapolis.
- Supposedly, the cheating was done by McNally, who never worked road games.
- Supposedly, the cheating on the day of the AFCC was specifically done in the hallway bathroom.
- Supposedly, this was the first time McNally ever took footballs into the hallway bathroom.
2. ALL evidence of McNally's or Jastremski's involvement in deflation is a few text messages earlier than the 2014-2015 season. But in October, 2014, Brady was furiously telling Jastremski (and by implication McNally) to ensure that the balls were inflated according to the rulebook. There is no possible timeline to connect the very, very few pieces of evidence.
3. McNally or Jastremski could have made a LOT of money selling a confessional story to the tabloids. They didn't do so. This strongly suggests that in fact they had nothing to confess.
And by the way, Jonathan Kraft just said that he's going to ask the league for permission to reinstate them in their jobs. So it's not as if somebody has paid them off to disappear.
Summing up:
- Nobody discovered a plan to cheat.
- Nobody even described a plan to cheat that fits the evidence.
- There was no plan to cheat.