a comparison between 2 vastly different teams? That makes exactly 0 sense.McCaffery vs #11 defense Northwestern 12 carries 66 yards rushing 23 yards receiving -8 yards KR 0 TDs 6 photios in tigerbeat
Henry vs #3 defense Wisconsin 13 carries 147 yard 3 TDS
Both teams in the BIG so the assessment is leaving out the SEC hate and the PSC stat padding defenses . That comparison says it all
That you haven't watched enough PAC football. What were those SEC defenses ranked before Henry destroyed them? The only legit comparison is the Northwestern/ Wisconsin comparison. I get it McCafferys a great feel good story. And hooking the teenage girl fan base is great for the sport. But it doesn't change the fact that McCafferys stats are severely p[added by very bad defenses that are geared against the pass.rush defense:
Oregon: 75
USC: 45
texas a&M: 104
Auburn: 91
Miss State: 72
you were saying?
"If any of the 3 shouldn't be there it is Henry."
All he did was break Bo Jackson and Herschel Walker all-time SEC records along the way. What an idiot you is.
That you haven't watched enough PAC football. What were those SEC defenses ranked before Henry destroyed them? The only legit comparison is the Northwestern/ Wisconsin comparison. I get it McCafferys a great feel good story. And hooking the teenage girl fan base is great for the sport. But it doesn't change the fact that McCafferys stats are severely p[added by very bad defenses that are geared against the pass.
You are right. Breaking a record that NO ONE IN COLLEGE FOOTBALL has broke in what like 28 years, he must suck. No one from the BIG 12 with all those crappy defenses. No one from the ACC with all those crappy defenses. Not Reggie Fucking Bush. No one.I think some of our posters have the Bieber fever don't touch the Stanford view masters sir they're dangerous
View attachment 63294
That you haven't watched enough PAC football. What were those SEC defenses ranked before Henry destroyed them? The only legit comparison is the Northwestern/ Wisconsin comparison. I get it McCafferys a great feel good story. And hooking the teenage girl fan base is great for the sport. But it doesn't change the fact that McCafferys stats are severely p[added by very bad defenses that are geared against the pass.
They aren't. Neither McCaffrey nor Henry are probably even top 5 backs in america.In honesty, I was mocking ythe teams you picked. Cal and WSU are god awful, but the idea that the SEC West was filled with great rush defenses is off the mark. 50% of the division foes he faced have rush defenses ranked outside the top 70. I am on record as saying not one of the 3 is even the best at their position, let alone the country
A comparison vs two top tier defenses in the nation, Its also the only comparison you can make between the 2 using top 25 defenses. Otherwise Henrys resume takes another nmassive jump over McCaffery. He played more top 25s too. in different conference. Makes A lot more sense than claiming Henry isn't on a whole other level from McCaffery. SEC defenses and PAC defenses are not even comparable. If that was the list of top defenses Biever faced than SC was awful this yeara comparison between 2 vastly different teams? That makes exactly 0 sense.
in this scenario putting fournette in the PAC and he triples barry sanders all purpose yards recordThe only reason Henry broke it and not Fournette was Henry had 70 more carries. If Fournette got the same amount of carries he blows all of Henrys numbers out of the water.
I wasn't sure I've heard so many wild claims that the PAC defenses didn't pad McCafferys statsIn honesty, I was mocking ythe teams you picked. Cal and WSU are god awful, but the idea that the SEC West was filled with great rush defenses is off the mark. 50% of the division foes he faced have rush defenses ranked outside the top 70. I am on record as saying not one of the 3 is even the best at their position, let alone the country
I absolutely love Bama fans.