- Thread starter
- #1
- 171,922
- 53,177
- 1,033
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2014
- Location
- Still stuck here in Nashville
- Hoopla Cash
- $ 406,579.02
Self explanatory.
Vote and discuss.
Vote and discuss.
Mayfield.
He's just better than Darnold.
Yeah, he is.Not by much.
Yeah, he is.
Last season Mayfield was hurt and he still threw for 215ypg, 6.6ypa, 17 TD's to 13 picks.
Darnold? 211ypg, 6.2 ypa, 9 TD's to 13 picks.
The TD's to picks is huge.
Considering the arsenal surrounding them, those numbers are pretty interchangeable. Probably baker, but neither is much better than the others.Yeah, he is.
Last season Mayfield was hurt and he still threw for 215ypg, 6.6ypa, 17 TD's to 13 picks.
Darnold? 211ypg, 6.2 ypa, 9 TD's to 13 picks.
The TD's to picks is huge.
Better, but far better? Nope.Far better team. They both suck, so I don't care to switch the numbers (and they likely would be switched). But I'm telling you, one is not that much better than the other. Both bad.
I just don't think it's super controversial to say a healthy Baker is significantly better than a backup level QB, whatever you think of Baker. Might be mediocre, but it's not awful either.8 voted for Baker? Where are the comments?
8 voted for Baker? Where are the comments?
It's a sports message board......for discussion!!!!You are so rooted into putting your poll over that you want this?:
It's a sports message board......for discussion!!!!
Screw you!!!!There goes my hero!
Screw you!!!!
What is there to comment about?8 voted for Baker? Where are the comments?
There goes my hero!