msgkings322
I'm just here to troll everyone
Oh for sure there is no scientific answer to the GOAT debates that’s what make them fun. Every sport has those handful of tippy top level guys who can make a case, but they all have different coaches, teammates, competitors, eras, positions, peak vs longevity etc. you can make great cases for most of them.Good post. When I’m invited into your criteria, I have to agree. However, if I think about this criteria and I apply it to other times, when Montana was GOAT I answer Marino to this question. When the GOAT was Brady I might have picked Manning with your criteria.
That’s why for me it’s about your track record and the resume you post when you’re done. Just my opinion. How you make these decisions is almost as fun a debate as the debate about the players.
For me this one is clear IMO. Same position for one thing, similar eras for Brady vs Mahomes. No one else is really in the conversation and if I have to win a game or I face a firing squad I want Mahomes
Other GOAT debates are impossible for me to choose like Jordan vs LeBron