Guide can’t eveb run
He's the future, yo!!!!
Guide can’t eveb run
- Released - A vested veteran is free when he is terminated and can sign with any club. Keep in mind, if the termination takes place between the end of the trading deadline and the end of the calendar year, the player goes through waivers.
Lol he WASgood. But teams that don’t care about the pr hit, redskinsHe's the future, yo!!!!
Well
1. The Redskins already have an racist name, you are unwilling to change.
2. Signed Foster and didn't even call the police to learn what the police had to say on the incident, no investigation into the second DV incident let alone the first.
3. In the last 26 seasons, 3 divisional titles, 2 playoff wins and 0 seasons with at least 11 wins
You liberal mf, we’ll see if your still running your mouth when the rams are one and done with that weak defense
I gave you a rainbow to match your panties btw.You liberal mf, we’ll see if your still running your mouth when the rams are one and done with that weak defense
He's already a FA.My guess would be no one. Poor guy is being made a poster child. He's done.
I gave you a rainbow to match your panties btw.
Poofter
Yeah, at this point it's pretty clear this is a problem- and despite his protesting otherwise- is him.Ok so no one claimed him. And apparently there is now a 3rd police report surfacing for hunt getting into a bar fight. All 3 in the off-season.
Dude obviously has Major anger issues and will be unemployed at least for a while
I know I will sound like a heel, but.....
If your team is going to go after in the offseason, you should have claimed him. Doesnt make sense not too. You would have him for pennies on the dollar with zero negotiating.
I know backlash & all that, but if you are going after him in the offseason, that is coming anyways.
Like I told you in the PM.I thought it was probably because you were a liberal homo
A) Pretty sure that's not how contracts work with players on their rookie contract.Agree. And that tells me no one is going to sign him in the off-season.
Either that, or they could sign him to a 1 year minimum contract with a clause in there that if he gets into any trouble he doesn't get a dime ...
well I am pretty the union wont allow that. But his contract was already cheap (Rookie contract)Agree. And that tells me no one is going to sign him in the off-season.
Either that, or they could sign him to a 1 year minimum contract with a clause in there that if he gets into any trouble he doesn't get a dime ...
well I am pretty the union wont allow that. But his contract was already cheap (Rookie contract)
I know I will sound like a heel, but.....
If your team is going to go after in the offseason, you should have claimed him. Doesnt make sense not too. You would have him for pennies on the dollar with zero negotiating.
I know backlash & all that, but if you are going after him in the offseason, that is coming anyways.