4down20
Quit checking me out.
-------
Most with the least (and I'll probably get shit for this) Boise State.
The least with the most (and I'll probably get shit for this as well) LSU
You deserve shit for both IMO.
-------
Most with the least (and I'll probably get shit for this) Boise State.
The least with the most (and I'll probably get shit for this as well) LSU
LSU, two national titles in the last eleven seasons and an appearance in the NCG three years ago after dominating the regular season. Wow. Interesting choice.
You deserve shit for both IMO.
Okay, I am more sold on Boise State now, but I am not that sold on TCU. TCU was one of the top mid-major recruiting classes and above many major conference teams quite often.
Boise State
2002 Recruiting Class - 74th (13th among mid majors)
2003 Recruiting Class - 100th (30th among mid majors)
2004 Recruiting Class - 99th (15th among mid majors)
2005 Recruiting Class - 64th (5th among mid majors)
2006 Recruiting Class - 70th (9th among mid majors)
2007 Recruiting Class - 68th (6th among mid majors)
2008 Recruiting Class - 89th (24th among mid majors)
2009 Recruiting Class - 72nd (12th among mid majors)
Regarding BSU, stadium or budget size has nothing to do with their success. It's the shitty, weak as fuck conference they play in. TCU used to dominate in the same conference; now look what happened when they joined a big boy conference. N. Illinois had 15 minutes of fame, then were blown out when they had to face real competition in their BCS bowl, so N. Illinois, like BSU, is a product of playing weak as shit competition year in and year out, will rarely play more than 1 team with NFL talent, and plays in a conference, like BSU, where the games are rarely sold out and where the fans rarely ever travel. Dont' believe me, refer to TCU and refer to former BSU coaches who dominated at BSU and failed miserably when they left to coach in a real conference. If BSU ever has an opportunity to join a real, big boy FBS conference, they will fall into irrelevancy just like the others.
Most- Bill Snyder coached K-State
Least- Oakland Raiders
I don't think he's ever had a highly regarded recruiting class. He also went to a program that almost cut its football program just prior to him getting hired. 8 years later he nearly played for a national title. Most of his teams have finished in the top 25 or just outside of it. He did this with mid-level recruits and JUCO guys.I think it is hard to tell with Bill Snyder. 2012 was a year he did a lot with little. He also had good recruiting classes too, but Ron Prince was head coach when they were juniors/seniors and they did awful. In recent history, Bill had a few low recruiting classes that, as juniors and seniors, won 6-7 games.
Bill Snyder did great through the mid-late 90s, but IDK what kind of recruiting classes he had during that time.
I think it is hard to tell with Bill Snyder. 2012 was a year he did a lot with little. He also had good recruiting classes too, but Ron Prince was head coach when they were juniors/seniors and they did awful. In recent history, Bill had a few low recruiting classes that, as juniors and seniors, won 6-7 games.
Bill Snyder did great through the mid-late 90s, but IDK what kind of recruiting classes he had during that time.
I don't think he's ever had a highly regarded recruiting class. He also went to a program that almost cut its football program just prior to him getting hired. 8 years later he nearly played for a national title. Most of his teams have finished in the top 25 or just outside of it. He did this with mid-level recruits and JUCO guys.
KSU never recruits.
2014: 49th
2013: 61
2012: 74
2011: 50
2010: 75
2009: 77
2008: 53
2007: 41
2006: 36
2005: 39
2004: 16
2003: 34
2002: 20
2001: 18
2000: 28
0 top 15 classes and 3 classes 20 or better.
CNNSI.com - College Football Recruiting - Signing Day madness means frenzy over rankings - Tuesday February 01, 2000 11:27 PMWhen I say good recruiting class for KSU, I think top 25-30 (same with Iowa). If we are to start with 2004 season (4 seasons after the 1st season listed), KSU has only had two 10-win seasons. I would say a team with 6-7 wins with a 30 something recruiting class is not doing a lot with a little.
If you can show his 1st 10 recruiting classes, then I will have an opinion of his "more with less" in the 90s, when he consistently had double-digit wins.
When I say good recruiting class for KSU, I think top 25-30 (same with Iowa). If we are to start with 2004 season (4 seasons after the 1st season listed), KSU has only had two 10-win seasons. I would say a team with 6-7 wins with a 30 something recruiting class is not doing a lot with a little.
If you can show his 1st 10 recruiting classes, then I will have an opinion of his "more with less" in the 90s, when he consistently had double-digit wins.
-------LSU, two national titles in the last eleven seasons and an appearance in the NCG three years ago after dominating the regular season. Wow. Interesting choice.
came back in 2009. Went 6-6, 7-6, 10-3, 11-2, and 8-5. That is pretty legit. They have been ranked 12 times in the schools history. He has been the coach every time. 1 bowl appearance outside of his tenure. He has a 66% winning percentage. Combined winning percentage of the rest is 35.5%. Prior 29 years before Snyder came they won 74 games or 2.55 per year. 27 the prior 11 years or 2.45 per game. Absolute train wreck of a program in the middle of no where with 0 recruiting areas near it. Just an amazing job.
-------
Trust me when I say this but I like the LSU program overall. But when you consider that they get great recruiting classes every year, yet two 3-loss years 1-4 loss year & 1-five loss year. Factor in the number of underachievers and I'm not that impressed.
Over the past decade, the Washington Huskies have been particularly pathetic despite having plenty of resources.
If Nebraska built a stadium with 300,000 seats in it we'd still sell out