Hey, I'd love for the Eagles to swap spots with the Bears. We pick up say the Eagles 4th, maybe even a 7th thrown in as well. And Poles would still get the player he's targeted at the 9th pick.
Despite the accolades thrown Jones' way for his ypc, if he couldnt crack the rotation in KC (which included an undrafted rookie), I seriously doubt he amounts to anything in Big D.
Could be Dallas is reading the tea leaves on Robinson's visit with the Eagles... Dallas has a lot less draft capital than Philly if they were move up. They've probably signed Jones as insurance.
To piggy back off the articleThree sensible reasons why Poles tacking a tackle with the 9th pick would best suit our needs:
3 reasons Chicago Bears should draft a tackle at pick #9
As the Chicago Bears have added more names to free agency, they have started to check off the boxes of the positions that they may or may not draft. With how mabeargoggleson.com
Likewise, there are three big IFs which can alter this line of thinking:
1. There still may be opportunities for Poles to sign a free agent tackle, which could affect the need of taking one with our first pick.
2. Poles might trade down from the 9 spot, and it's anyone's guess how far he trades back and who would be available at that point.
3. Poles might have a non-tackle listed tops on his board when he's on the clock and if so, he might take that player instead.
Three sensible reasons why Poles tacking a tackle with the 9th pick would best suit our needs:
3 reasons Chicago Bears should draft a tackle at pick #9
As the Chicago Bears have added more names to free agency, they have started to check off the boxes of the positions that they may or may not draft. With how ma
Likewise, there are three big IFs which can alter this line of thinking:
1. There still may be opportunities for Poles to sign a free agent tackle, which could affect the need of taking one with our first pick.
2. Poles might trade down from the 9 spot, and it's anyone's guess how far he trades back and who would be available at that point.
3. Poles might have a non-tackle listed tops on his board when he's on the clock and if so, he might take that player instead.
I've mentioned before that there is one team who I'd do a trade back with in a heartbeat and that's the Titans at #11. Of course the only scenario I see which would get them to want our #9 is that one of the big 4 QBs remains on the board, something I believe is not likely. But for the sake of argument, let's say one is there. Moving back two spots is not a big deal when considering the team that would now be drafting ahead of us are the Eagles, and I don't see them taking any player that Poles was zeroing in on. Don't think we'd get all that much in return for the Titans swap, maybe an extra 2nd or 3rd rounder. But the point is we've lost nothing in terms of acquiring the player we want, yet we obtain another decent draft pick in the process. Win-win baby.
Marking my book as I type.
www.windycitygridiron.com
Ronald Jones? Because a guy who was a healthy scratch a lot of last year is moving the needle? Lol
You think the Bucs roll with Trask and not Mayfield?
