- Thread starter
- #121
Heston as our #5???
I should have stopped reading at that point. But I didn't...
The ink on the Porcello deal is not dry yet. They signed that thing less than 4 months ago. They are not going to "give him away and pay a lot of his salary too". He is an innings eater, and those are valuable, almost at any cost. He ain't going anywhere.
But, Heston as our #5? Really?
Yes, really. And Porcello is basically out the door already. They hate him here in MA, where I live and hear all the grumblings of fans. The Red Sox are trying to trade him, Pablo, and HanRam. They just signed all of them. Heston is a rookie and he is a good number 5. Cain and Peavy are better for now. And I am only talking about for this season and this post season.
You also have to understand the mindset here in MA. Red Sox > any other thing in MA. They have the 3rd highest payroll and one of the worst records. They will eat money to get rid of players right now. They have a ton of talent in the minors to bring up in the next 2 season. They are willing to eat money to get rid of players they don't want. They do it all the time. They also believe that there are people who can't handle the media and pressure here and if they can't it is better to get rid of them earlier than later.
An example of that is On December 17, they signed Rentería to a four-year, forty million dollar contract with an option for 2009. They felt he could not handle the pressure of playing in Boston and he was playing poorly so they traded him for a prospect after only a year. They ended up eating a ton of money on that deal. But once they felt he couldn't handle the pressure he was a goner. They did the same for Crawford and AGon when they traded them to the Dodgers.
He will have to go to a tiny-market team. Minnesota, Milwaukee, Cleveland, Miami, Tampa, San Diego...I hope you don't want Porcello on the Giants. He's owed $83 million for 2016-2019, and he has really only had one decent season in his career, in 2012. His season ERA has only been under 4.00 twice. He is young (26+), but way, way, way too expensive for his skill set.
The Boston media and fans can be brutal. Why Pablo ever thought he could make it a go there is beyond me. He was adored here in the Bay Area. Even when he wasn't hitting, he was not about to be thrown to the wolves.
Where will he wind up? He has DH written all over him.
I hope you don't want Porcello on the Giants. He's owed $83 million for 2016-2019, and he has really only had one decent season in his career, in 2012. His season ERA has only been under 4.00 twice. He is young (26+), but way, way, way too expensive for his skill set.
The Boston media and fans can be brutal. Why Pablo ever thought he could make it a go there is beyond me. He was adored here in the Bay Area. Even when he wasn't hitting, he was not about to be thrown to the wolves.
Where will he wind up? He has DH written all over him.
Really??Mat Latos and Michael Morse have been traded to the Dodgers
Really??
I had no idea
Your summary was still helpful.
I blame the boards. I opened the thread and only thing it showed was your "Morse to LAD" post, so I posted it haha.
Latos to the dogs as well.
This one makes makes so much sense, cosmically, that I am beginning to rethink my belief in a higher being. There must be a greater plan if Latos ends up wearing the blue.
This. So much this. I liken it to when the wayduhs moved to LA. Perfect fit.
One T as a doyer. PERFECT. And the cost is they picked up a DH for their interleague games.
Stupid doyers....lol.
I would not be surprised if they try to move Morse. He does not fit anything that they need.I understand Latos, but Beast? Where will he play? The OF is crowded, and will get more so when Crawford comes back. You can't move AGon from 1st. Guess he is a bench guy only. He deserves better than to wear Doyer blue.
I am uneasy trading Beede, but for a young-ish stud SP under control for multiple years, it might make sense to bight the bullet.
As much as SOME of us love Susac, his primary value to us is as a trade-chip. The FO should not ignore his true value and quickly dispose of him just because he does not have a clear starting role on this team (I do not believe that they are doing this, btw).
At this point, if Crick can be the final piece to get us a major asset, I am OK with parting with him at this point.
High price to pay. Maybe too high. But I think I could stomach that package.