• Have something to say? Register Now! and be posting in minutes!

POLL Top 10 poll: #14 player ever

Who is the #14 player in baseball history? Vote for 3!!


  • Total voters
    36
  • Poll closed .

msgkings322

I'm just here to troll everyone
136,446
58,522
1,033
Joined
Aug 11, 2010
Hoopla Cash
$ 4,700.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Voted for my pitcher (Clemens) and my unicorn (Ohtani). Need to pick the next hitter to nominate now that Schmidt is off the board. Trying to decide between Henderson, Pujols, ARod, and Speaker. Maybe Frank Robinson?

Ok guys, pander for my vote!
 

calsnowskier

Sarcastic F-wad
64,760
18,921
1,033
Joined
Aug 11, 2010
Location
San Diego
Hoopla Cash
$ 2,900.09
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Okay, let's compare ERA+ seasons (if I'm doing the breakdowns that you created correctly) between Young and Greg Maddux:

200+ - Young (1), Maddux (2)
190-199 - Young (1), Maddux (0)
180-189 - Young (0), Maddux (2)
170-179 - Young (1), Maddux (1)
160-169 - Young (1), Maddux (2)
150-159 - Young (2), Maddux (2)
140-149 - Young (4), Maddux (1)
130-139 - Young (3), Maddux (0)
120-129 - Young (4), Maddux (2)
and even looking at this breakdown…

160+ Maddux (7) Young (4)

Maddux had almost twice as many ELITE seasons as Young. Young has more really good seasons (120-159) 13-5. That means Young had 17 very good season vs 12 for Maddux. Both very good, but context is added, personally, I go Maddux.
 

calsnowskier

Sarcastic F-wad
64,760
18,921
1,033
Joined
Aug 11, 2010
Location
San Diego
Hoopla Cash
$ 2,900.09
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Omg. That is awesome.... when this started, I had him about 30. The great discussions here have made me adjust him up to about 22....
Handshake Wrestle GIF by Adult Swim
 

broncosmitty

Banned in Europe
94,566
28,680
1,033
Joined
Apr 19, 2013
Location
Almost Paradise
Hoopla Cash
$ 16,206.54
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Side observations.. Bonds is probably the #1 poster boy for steroids (and Clemens isn't far behind)... Bonds was also a major arrogant prick (and Clemens isn't far behind)...

How people here voted for Bonds, but are skipping Clemens is weird... I m o...
It most likely is on account of all his BS as an Astro (no ST, not coming to the park unless he’s starting, load management season, being a bitch in general…) but I’ll be voting for Kody Clemens before I vote for Roger.

Hope he keeps falling. He’s not the second best pitcher ever.
 

LHG

Former Californian. Hesitant Tennessean.
19,584
9,314
533
Joined
Aug 1, 2015
Location
Somewhere in the middle of nowhere
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
I think Speaker was actually a little above Wagner in the same tier. Young is the hardest player for me to rank. I dont think his style translates. I think to a certain degree Mathewson and maybe Lefty were as respected or more respected.
Agree on Speaker. I don't remember Wagner's offensive numbers being any better than Speaker's.

Don't really understand what you mean by Young's style doesn't translate. It could just as easily be assumed that if Young pitched today that he would have been just like Maddux and dominated. If I am guessing correctly here, it seems a bit unfair to assume that modern players would have been super dominant if they played in the early eras but guys from that time frame would have been lost in today's game. The assumption I pick from that is that modern guys would be built like modern players in a pre modern era and would thus dominate but the pre modern guys would not be built like modern players and thus get dominated. I think, when trying to put players in different eras, we have to assume that they would be a player typical for that different era and it comes down to talent and not the physical build of the player or the resources (or lack thereof) to be great.
 

calsnowskier

Sarcastic F-wad
64,760
18,921
1,033
Joined
Aug 11, 2010
Location
San Diego
Hoopla Cash
$ 2,900.09
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Side observations.. Bonds is probably the #1 poster boy for steroids (and Clemens isn't far behind)... Bonds was also a major arrogant prick (and Clemens isn't far behind)...

How people here voted for Bonds, but are skipping Clemens is weird... I m o...
Agree. But in my opinion, Bonds belongs at the higher slot, so I don’t really see a big inconsistency here.
 

calsnowskier

Sarcastic F-wad
64,760
18,921
1,033
Joined
Aug 11, 2010
Location
San Diego
Hoopla Cash
$ 2,900.09
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Voted for my pitcher (Clemens) and my unicorn (Ohtani). Need to pick the next hitter to nominate now that Schmidt is off the board. Trying to decide between Henderson, Pujols, ARod, and Speaker. Maybe Frank Robinson?

Ok guys, pander for my vote!
I am good with all but ARod. This poll should be for baseball players only.
 

msgkings322

I'm just here to troll everyone
136,446
58,522
1,033
Joined
Aug 11, 2010
Hoopla Cash
$ 4,700.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
I am good with all but ARod. This poll should be for baseball players only.
Yes you’ve done that bit for a while now. Ok how do I choose among the other 3-4? I guess for you it’s Henderson?
 

LHG

Former Californian. Hesitant Tennessean.
19,584
9,314
533
Joined
Aug 1, 2015
Location
Somewhere in the middle of nowhere
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
and even looking at this breakdown…

160+ Maddux (7) Young (4)

Maddux had almost twice as many ELITE seasons as Young. Young has more really good seasons (120-159) 13-5. That means Young had 17 very good season vs 12 for Maddux. Both very good, but context is added, personally, I go Maddux.
Yes, Maddux was slightly more dominant in his best years than Young but also had a lower floor in his career than Young. This exercise maybe puts Young closer to Maddux for me but I'd still go Young over Maddux.
 

msgkings322

I'm just here to troll everyone
136,446
58,522
1,033
Joined
Aug 11, 2010
Hoopla Cash
$ 4,700.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Agree on Speaker. I don't remember Wagner's offensive numbers being any better than Speaker's.

Don't really understand what you mean by Young's style doesn't translate. It could just as easily be assumed that if Young pitched today that he would have been just like Maddux and dominated. If I am guessing correctly here, it seems a bit unfair to assume that modern players would have been super dominant if they played in the early eras but guys from that time frame would have been lost in today's game. The assumption I pick from that is that modern guys would be built like modern players in a pre modern era and would thus dominate but the pre modern guys would not be built like modern players and thus get dominated. I think, when trying to put players in different eras, we have to assume that they would be a player typical for that different era and it comes down to talent and not the physical build of the player or the resources (or lack thereof) to be great.
I think of it a little differently. I agree a modern Babe Ruth would have had a different life story and training regimen but that’s all hypothetical. What is not hypothetical is how fast the modern players can throw and run and swing a bat and how much better the modern players are at the literal activities of baseball. In my mind I’m voting on who they were not who they could have been in an alternate universe. It’s just one way to do it, other ways are valid too, that’s mine.
 

Clayton

Well-Known Member
39,790
12,279
1,033
Joined
May 17, 2012
Hoopla Cash
$ 7,000.14
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Voted for my pitcher (Clemens) and my unicorn (Ohtani). Need to pick the next hitter to nominate now that Schmidt is off the board. Trying to decide between Henderson, Pujols, ARod, and Speaker.

Ok guys, pander for my vote!
You're generally a traits guy and I think ARod would be the pick based on how you vote. If you adjust for ballparks I think Pujols edges him out with the bat and Pujols was solid at 1B but I don't think that would get him above ARod or Speaker, tbh.

Speaker was the best at hitting doubles, great at hitting triples, was a good centerfielder in his time , was a player coach who implemented situational baseball which best to my knowledge was rare. If cheating bothers you then maybe he is the pick.

Henderson is the best baserunner.
 

calsnowskier

Sarcastic F-wad
64,760
18,921
1,033
Joined
Aug 11, 2010
Location
San Diego
Hoopla Cash
$ 2,900.09
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Yes you’ve done that bit for a while now. Ok how do I choose among the other 3-4? I guess for you it’s Henderson?
At the nomination stage, I don’t really have a huge preference of the other 3.

Rickey is a unicorn. I have argued my “bit” on him for a while now.

Pujols is probably the greatest 1B in the history of the game. If he gets to the voting portion, I could see myself getting behind him.

Speaker has the numbers, but I see him as the #4 or so player of his type from his era. Hard to go with that over other greats from other eras.
 

calsnowskier

Sarcastic F-wad
64,760
18,921
1,033
Joined
Aug 11, 2010
Location
San Diego
Hoopla Cash
$ 2,900.09
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Yes, Maddux was slightly more dominant in his best years than Young but also had a lower floor in his career than Young. This exercise maybe puts Young closer to Maddux for me but I'd still go Young over Maddux.
They are close, and reasonable people can come to different conclusions.
 

msgkings322

I'm just here to troll everyone
136,446
58,522
1,033
Joined
Aug 11, 2010
Hoopla Cash
$ 4,700.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
You're generally a traits guy and I think ARod would be the pick based on how you vote. If you adjust for ballparks I think Pujols edges him out with the bat and Pujols was solid at 1B but I don't think that would get him above ARod or Speaker, tbh.

Speaker was the best at hitting doubles, great at hitting triples, was a good centerfielder in his time , was a player coach who implemented situational baseball which best to my knowledge was rare. If cheating bothers you then maybe he is the pick.

Henderson is the best baserunner.
Great points but one of ARod’s traits was cheating. I’m torn how to factor that in for him. Doesn’t bother me at all with Bonds or Clemens, but as cal correctly notes his cheating was far worse and actually illegal. It’s tricky. ARod also has the best numbers of the remaining hitters.
 

Cedrique

Well-Known Member
20,178
5,668
533
Joined
Jul 3, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 950.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Voted for my pitcher (Clemens) and my unicorn (Ohtani). Need to pick the next hitter to nominate now that Schmidt is off the board. Trying to decide between Henderson, Pujols, ARod, and Speaker. Maybe Frank Robinson?

Ok guys, pander for my vote!
I can't even figure out my own. I got Joe Morgan in there for the moment, but my picks are subject to change. The more I look at Morgan his absolute Prime was absolutely awesome but it really only lasted 5 or 6 seasons compared to some guys who had more elite seasons.
 

Clayton

Well-Known Member
39,790
12,279
1,033
Joined
May 17, 2012
Hoopla Cash
$ 7,000.14
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Agree on Speaker. I don't remember Wagner's offensive numbers being any better than Speaker's.

Don't really understand what you mean by Young's style doesn't translate. It could just as easily be assumed that if Young pitched today that he would have been just like Maddux and dominated. If I am guessing correctly here, it seems a bit unfair to assume that modern players would have been super dominant if they played in the early eras but guys from that time frame would have been lost in today's game. The assumption I pick from that is that modern guys would be built like modern players in a pre modern era and would thus dominate but the pre modern guys would not be built like modern players and thus get dominated. I think, when trying to put players in different eras, we have to assume that they would be a player typical for that different era and it comes down to talent and not the physical build of the player or the resources (or lack thereof) to be great.
My assumption with Cyclone Young is that if he was a modern pitcher he'd have to use his Cyclone way, way, way more. It would almost certainly cut down on his longevity but I can't say that for certain. Pitching has changed so much. They're like race horses now.

I think there is a chance Young was better than Wagner. As such, I do think I need to wedge him in here somewhere. Its just that its going to be difficult to sell him over modern pitchers.
 

Cedrique

Well-Known Member
20,178
5,668
533
Joined
Jul 3, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 950.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
My assumption with Cyclone Young is that if he was a modern pitcher he'd have to use his Cyclone way, way, way more. It would almost certainly cut down on his longevity but I can't say that for certain. Pitching has changed so much. They're like race horses now.

I think there is a chance Young was better than Wagner. As such, I do think I need to wedge him in here somewhere. Its just that its going to be difficult to sell him over modern pitchers.
I have to look more into Cy Young but it's a little disappointing that he didn't stick around for that 750th complete game.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LHG
Top