TheRobotDevil
Immortal
and despite an aqquital you just knew it wasn't worth it because the fact remains that his guilt was still in question.
These people don't get it.
I always thought he was guilty. I don't view things through blinders
and despite an aqquital you just knew it wasn't worth it because the fact remains that his guilt was still in question.
These people don't get it.
That's bullshit. Look at the accumulative evidence and tell me you personally believe his story. You have NO reason to believe him. There is NO reason to believe him.
And I'm talking u personally, not the cops or court. You.
Ill let you know if/when it happens. Guess Im one of those who'd rather be sure before pulling the switch on the electric chair, than be the one to pull it and find out later that the guy was innocent.
Either way, I have no clue what happened that evening, but am also DAMNED certain that you dont either.
FSUManager does...he is an expertIll let you know if/when it happens. Guess Im one of those who'd rather be sure before pulling the switch on the electric chair, than be the one to pull it and find out later that the guy was innocent.
Either way, I have no clue what happened that evening, but am also DAMNED certain that you dont either.
Ill let you know if/when it happens. Guess Im one of those who'd rather be sure before pulling the switch on the electric chair, than be the one to pull it and find out later that the guy was innocent.
Either way, I have no clue what happened that evening, but am also DAMNED certain that you dont either.
What cumulative evidence? His DNA in her panties, but not inside or on her? Her boyfriend's DNA on her panties? What cumulative other than SHE SAID is there to look at?
Come on and enlighten me here boss. Seems you know what happened. And it seems you keep fucking forgetting that I was the FIRST person on the Hoop to say if he did it to nail his nuts to the wall. The very fucking first one.
If you want to try and use the FHRITP comment, stolen crablegs, hunting squirrel on campus, month long bb gun fight with 5 other players, and the soda thing as equaling he did in FACT r*pe a person that is one trip that I will not make. Not because I like him, but because he is innocent until PROVEN GUILTY with the allegation!
Let's not mention that her friend said she left with 3 guys willingly, his two teammates had very similar stories to hers. What is there exactly beside trying to link other non sexual incidents to him?
The word credibility comes to mind for some odd reason? Another word is characterDo you Winston defenders honestly not see why people think he is guilty?
I mean if you add everything up do you really not see why people feel this way.
Take the letter of the law out of it. I'm talking about Everything surrounding the case.
His lack of control
Actually being accused
Being a Thief
Being an idiot
Thinking he is invincible
We all know this doesn't equal guilt but you have to realize why people might just actually believe his accuser.
Now now Fred, I am think an adult who stuffed seafood down his pants and forgot about them would certainly be able to make rational decisionsSo, do you think he did it or not? Simple question.
He can throw a football and plays QB for FSU, you wouldn't consider him guilty if the FBI had evidence on himWhat cumulative evidence? His DNA in her panties, but not inside or on her? Her boyfriend's DNA on her panties? What cumulative other than SHE SAID is there to look at?
Come on and enlighten me here boss. Seems you know what happened. And it seems you keep fucking forgetting that I was the FIRST person on the Hoop to say if he did it to nail his nuts to the wall. The very fucking first one.
If you want to try and use the FHRITP comment, stolen crablegs, hunting squirrel on campus, month long bb gun fight with 5 other players, and the soda thing as equaling he did in FACT r*pe a person that is one trip that I will not make. Not because I like him, but because he is innocent until PROVEN GUILTY with the allegation!
Let's not mention that her friend said she left with 3 guys willingly, his two teammates had very similar stories to hers. What is there exactly beside trying to link other non sexual incidents to him?
So, do you think he did it or not? Simple question.
What cumulative evidence? His DNA in her panties, but not inside or on her? Her boyfriend's DNA on her panties? What cumulative other than SHE SAID is there to look at?
Come on and enlighten me here boss. Seems you know what happened. And it seems you keep fucking forgetting that I was the FIRST person on the Hoop to say if he did it to nail his nuts to the wall. The very fucking first one.
If you want to try and use the FHRITP comment, stolen crablegs, hunting squirrel on campus, month long bb gun fight with 5 other players, and the soda thing as equaling he did in FACT r*pe a person that is one trip that I will not make. Not because I like him, but because he is innocent until PROVEN GUILTY with the allegation!
Let's not mention that her friend said she left with 3 guys willingly, his two teammates had very similar stories to hers. What is there exactly beside trying to link other non sexual incidents to him?
He can throw a football and plays QB for FSU, you wouldn't consider him guilty if the FBI had evidence on him
He has done stupid shit in the past.... Of course he's guilty, because I want him to be guilty. Anyone who disagrees with me is wrong. Deal with it
Perhaps there was no DNA inside her because the glove fit
That is a possibility, but that still does not mean a sexual assault occurred though.