The top 25 ranking of NFL GM's

[SteelersPride]

I haven't ignored it. I acknowledged it and then went back and adjusted the numbers and his original point turned out to be even worse.

again, figure out what im saying first............

 

[NWPATSFAN]

Yeah it's tough to count to 7, or know the difference between 20 and 21.

One would think yet at least three Philly clowns couldn't

 

[ericd7633]

One would think yet at least three Philly clowns couldn't

I assumed you weren't a complete dumbass and could actually count to 20 to reference the number of seasons for the Eagles. Shame on me, at least I know going forward I'm dealing with a dumbass from the beginning.

 

[EKA]

I assumed you weren't a complete dumbass and could actually count to 20 to reference the number of seasons for the Eagles. Shame on me, at least I know going forward I'm dealing with a dumbass from the beginning.

The sad part is, he still doesn't realize he went back 21 years to get his number. Then said Eagles fans couldn't count to 20. I made the same mistake you did. I assumed his number of season at or below .500 was an accurate stat. Like you, I now know that I have to double check any stat he says.

And before anyone can point out the mistake in my last post. The Pats actually have 43 more wins in the last 20 years than the Eagles, not 35.

 

[NWPATSFAN]

So we're going lifetime then? Then your previous point that the Eagles are 1 and done is wrong. They've won an NFL championship 4 times in their lifetime. Only 2 shy of the patriots. Not only that but pre 2000 the Pats were more mediocre than the Eagles. They lost more games and won less in the previous 34 years than the Eagles. But, they've won 35 more since then. I'd say the Pats are lucky to have gotten Brady and Belichick for the last 20 years to pump their all time record up.

You can't be this dumb? Are you playing me? WTF is it with Eagle fans and their desire to spin, deflect, twist, move goal posts for everything?

Who the hell brought up "NFL" championships besides you? Let me guess you think a basketball team that won an ABA championship also won an NBA championship. ​

I don't know when you want to start. I brought up the last 20 years with another poster as a point about their cap management. You brought up that they were mediocre record wise in that time. Then you went lifetime. And at 1 point went the last 3 years. I have no problem saying the Eagles were pathetic for much of the 60's 70's and mid80's. That was never an argument except in your mind.
You're forgetting there are Moe, Larry and Curly chiming in stuck in their eternal vortex.

If someone asks a questions I respond to that question. Whether it's from that posts or one of your/their other stupid posts. You know, like this one.




You brought up the .500 or worse as the standard. Then you got the numbers wrong when you said the Eagles had 7 season at or below .500. Again your standard. I admit that I didn't double check you, but your number worked if you go back to 1999 which I assume others thought you did. Then you couldn't grasp why Koy didn't mention a team tied with the Eagles when he was talking about teams that were BETTER.
Wasn't my standard moron. You introduced 20 years. Give it a rest you've been clowned for days on that one.

Only one spinning anything is you. You got the numbers wrong. You claim being in the top 10 out of 32 is mediocre. Not us. I mean they have the 5th most wins in that timeframe with a championship to boot. If that's mediocre for a 20 year stretch, sign me up for the next 20 years.

I will enjoy 20-50 more years of mediocrity. Keep setting that bar low. Again can you and your cronies tell me again how the Eagles are trending up? Pick the timeframe that best suits your agenda. You may win a small battle.



And I think he admitted he was wrong. But, you couldnt' count to 20 when you added up the numbers you claim either.

Are you done yet? Kleenex on aisle 11. I suggest the COSTCO size for you.

 

[NWPATSFAN]

I assumed you weren't a complete dumbass and could actually count to 20 to reference the number of seasons for the Eagles. Shame on me, at least I know going forward I'm dealing with a dumbass from the beginning.

Shame on you.

I knew long ago I was dealing with a bunch of dumbasses.

I literally spent hours verifying all your (MO, Larry and Curly) inaccuracies.

 

[EKA]

You do realize that 7 of the past 20 years the Eagles have been at or below .500? What is your definition of good?

Post number 152. The 1st time anyone brought up records and standards for what was later termed mediocrity. Number 1 the stat is wrong of 7 out of 20. Number 2 you set the standard for at or below .500 which we've gone off of since this post.

 

[ericd7633]

Shame on you.

I knew long ago I was dealing with a bunch of dumbasses.

I literally spent hours verifying all your (MO, Larry and Curly) inaccuracies.

Feel free to tell me where I was wrong about anything in this thread? I get you're probably trolling at this point, but...I'll still call you a dumbass one more time.

 

[NWPATSFAN]

The sad part is, he still doesn't realize he went back 21 years to get his number. Then said Eagles fans couldn't count to 20. I made the same mistake you did. I assumed his number of season at or below .500 was an accurate stat. Like you, I now know that I have to double check any stat he says.

And before anyone can point out the mistake in my last post. The Pats actually have 43 more wins in the last 20 years than the Eagles, not 35.

STFU you are full of shit. You were adamant that 2000-2019 WASN'T twenty years. Stop trying to play it off clown.

Good to see you're still applying that new Philly math in your last post.

 

[NWPATSFAN]

Feel free to tell me where I was wrong about anything in this thread? I get you're probably trolling at this point, but...I'll still call you a dumbass one more time.

How about for starters we just go with who introduced anything about 20 years first.

Go to bed you've been tucked in already.

 

[NWPATSFAN]

Feel free to tell me where I was wrong about anything in this thread? I get you're probably trolling at this point, but...I'll still call you a dumbass one more time.

BTW don't flatter yourself. You haven't reached the (Moe, Larry & Curly) level yet. Thus the reason I separated them with parenthesis and you had your very own pic. I am looking at casting you as Shemp or Joe so you have that to look forward to

 

[ericd7633]

How about for starters we just go with who introduced anything about 20 years first.

Go to bed you've been tucked in already.

My God you are incredibly dumb. Got to be the dumbest person on this site I've ever interacted with. Since I'm sure you have no clue to the question you asked, it wasn't me.

 

[ericd7633]

BTW don't flatter yourself. You haven't reached the (Moe, Larry & Curly) level yet. Thus the reason I separated them with parenthesis and you had your very own pic. I am looking at casting you as Shemp or Joe so you have that to look forward to

Shit and you're not even funny either. Feel bad for you at this point.

 

[EKA]

You can't be this dumb? Are you playing me? WTF is it with Eagle fans and their desire to spin, deflect, twist, move goal posts for everything?

Who the hell brought up "NFL" championships besides you? Let me guess you think a basketball team that won an ABA championship also won an NBA championship.

You're the one that went from 20 years to lifetime to 3 years back to 20 years back to lifetime. I'm beginning to lose track what/when you want to argue about.

You brought up championships when you said the eagles were in the bucs realm of 1 and done. That's Super Bowl era NFL championships. But, if you want to go back to 1933 to prove your record point, you have to acknowledge then that the Eagles have 4 championships. The Super Bowl still determines the NFL champion. Just because the NFL championship changed the game name doesn't make pre super bowl NFL championships not NFL championship.

Don't get your ABA point.

Wasn't my standard moron. You introduced 20 years. Give it a rest you've been clowned for days on that one.

I introduced 20 years for a different argument with another poster. That standard was in a discussion about the cap. The closest I came to equating 20 years with record was saying the Eagles were in contention for the most part that whole timeframe. In my opinion, you have to be in playoff contention to be discussed as being in contention. 13 years out of 20 in the playoffs is what the Eagles accomplished in that time frame. As I pointed out above, you brought up the 1st mention of record (at or below .500)

I will enjoy 20-50 more years of mediocrity. Keep setting that bar low. Again can you and your cronies tell me again how the Eagles are trending up? Pick the timeframe that best suits your agenda. You may win a small battle.

I didn't say the Eagles are trending up, so take that up with whoever said that. Not sure what agenda you think I have, but tell me how a team top 5 in wins over a timeframe is mediocre. You decided that 7 out of 20 years being .500 or less was mediocre, and even that you got wrong.

I've never said the Eagles were mediocre during the last 20 years. I've maintained the same argument that they've be fairly consistent being good. The exact word I used when I 1st said 20 years. So, you tell me what timeframe and what point you want to make.

Are you done yet? Kleenex on aisle 11. I suggest the COSTCO size for you.

[/quote]

 

[NWPATSFAN]

My God you are incredibly dumb. Got to be the dumbest person on this site I've ever interacted with. Since I'm sure you have no clue to the question you asked, it wasn't me.

Did I say it was you Einstein?

You didn't bring it up but you kept saying I did.

Go to sleep these nightmares will stop soon.

 

[NWPATSFAN]

Shit and you're not even funny either. Feel bad for you at this point.

Nice come back you're getting closer and closer to becoming the fourth stooge.

 

[EKA]

My God you are incredibly dumb. Got to be the dumbest person on this site I've ever interacted with. Since I'm sure you have no clue to the question you asked, it wasn't me.

I have to believe he's just trolling at this point. I can barely keep up with what i'm arguing with him about anymore. 1 post its the last 3 years. Then its 20. Then its lifetime record, but not lifetime championships. It's hard to argue when you point out someones mistake and they ignore it and say they've proven YOU wrong.

 

[NWPATSFAN]

You're the one that went from 20 years to lifetime to 3 years back to 20 years back to lifetime. I'm beginning to lose track what/when you want to argue about.

You brought up championships when you said the eagles were in the bucs realm of 1 and done. That's Super Bowl era NFL championships. But, if you want to go back to 1933 to prove your record point, you have to acknowledge then that the Eagles have 4 championships. The Super Bowl still determines the NFL champion. Just because the NFL championship changed the game name doesn't make pre super bowl NFL championships not NFL championship.

Don't get your ABA point.



I introduced 20 years for a different argument with another poster. That standard was in a discussion about the cap. The closest I came to equating 20 years with record was saying the Eagles were in contention for the most part that whole timeframe. In my opinion, you have to be in playoff contention to be discussed as being in contention. 13 years out of 20 in the playoffs is what the Eagles accomplished in that time frame. As I pointed out above, you brought up the 1st mention of record (at or below .500)



I didn't say the Eagles are trending up, so take that up with whoever said that. Not sure what agenda you think I have, but tell me how a team top 5 in wins over a timeframe is mediocre. You decided that 7 out of 20 years being .500 or less was mediocre, and even that you got wrong.

I've never said the Eagles were mediocre during the last 20 years. I've maintained the same argument that they've be fairly consistent being good. The exact word I used when I 1st said 20 years. So, you tell me what timeframe and what point you want to make.

[/QUOTE]


I'm sure once the earth stopped spinning for you, you came up with this horse crap? Once again you've decided to cherry pick which ever posts fits your hourly agenda.

You've literally been all over the board. I've done nothing but continually ask you and the rest of the Philly clowns what time frames they wanted to use as it changes almost every page.

 

[ericd7633]

Did I say it was you Einstein?

You didn't bring it up but you kept saying I did.

Go to sleep these nightmares will stop soon.

No, the only thing I brought up is that you can't count. Pretty evident by you saying the Eagles had 7 such seasons of below or at a .500 record.

 

[EKA]

You tell us. Who do you think the Eagles let go unwillingly to make it happen? And be realistic, cause saying someone like Foles is dumb. No team could realistically keep 2 QB's making 20-30 million each so 1 had to go. The Eagles for 20+ years have targeted players to extend and have pretty much been able to get rid of players before their play lessened. Have they had some bad contracts? Of course. Have they made some mistakes with players? Of course. But, like I said, for the most part, players they've let go, have been by their choosing not by the cap hell so many here have been saying the Eagles are in.

What exactly is kicking the can down the road? All teams do extensions and contract manipulation to "kick the can down the road". Every single one of them. The good teams, that stay in contention for long periods, manage that so they don't get in a situation where they need a fire sale to get under the cap. The Eagles are one of those teams. They've don't it for 20+ years since Joe Banner.

That kicking the can as you say is nothing more than dead money on a cap. You don't think teams have dead money allocated to a portion of their cap? It's when the bad contracts that the dead money percentage cant handle that teams get in cap trouble and have to release players they don't want to because of the cap. The Eagles, for the most part, have not been in this situation the last 20+ years.
.

I'm sure once the earth stopped spinning for you, you came up with this horse crap? Once again you've decided to cherry pick which ever posts fits your hourly agenda.

You've literally been all over the board. I've done nothing but continually ask you and the rest of the Philly clowns what time frames they wanted to use as it changes almost every page.

These are the 1st 2 posts I said anything about 20 years. Can you comprehend that my point to the poster I was talking to about this, that I clearly was talking about the cap. Me and him went back and forth about it for a few posts. I even bolded for you the closest I came to mentioning anything about record. And that was just saying that good team manage the cap to stay in contention.

You were the 1st to bring up any kind of record talk in the post I quoted above. I asked you numerous times to give me a time frame YOU want to use. The 1st time I mentioned anything about lifetime was in a direct response to you saying the Eagles "lifetime" record is proof of their mediocrity.

So tell me, exactly what have I cherry picked and except for a direct response to your lifetime quote did I take anything other than the 20 years I was origninally talking about the cap for? The point you originally tried to make was wrong by the numbers and you've jumped around ever since it was pointed out that your numbers were wrong. I already admitted I made a mistake by trusting your numbers were correct. Can you admit you've been wrong about just about everything you've said so far?