- Thread starter
- #9,361
I'm not saying have no rules at all, but the purpose of many of them is to help the lower tier teams cope with their severe disadvantage. WSU will never have the money or attraction of USC and no regulations will ever come close to balancing that out. But WSU will always have a massive advantage over middle Tennessee or even their neighbor, Idaho.
The so-called power 5 should break off and have a new governing set of rules that reflects a much much higher floor than those lower tier mid majors. Keep the scholarship caps and the basic recruiting rules, but allow things like these camps and even more compensation for players.
I just don't think we need more regulations when the NCAA can't fairly deal with the ones they are already in charge of.
I agree that the playing field isn't even and never has been, but that doesn't mean you don't even it out where you can.
For example, a program like USC is pretty much always going to attract more talented players than a school like Utah because of "built in advantages". Nothing wrong with that advantage, it's kids making choices based on traditions, history, location, number of hot chicks, etc., etc. There isn't much that can be done about that.
However, by capping how much a program can spend on these camps, it keeps a school like USC from adding to it's "built in advantages".
I also agree about bringing back "real football". I'm all for player safety, but some of the rule changes are pretty ridiculous and I can see where they can actually lead to more injury.
Wait a minute, have you ever been to Utah? There is some very hot women that live there, playing the hottest women card live in S. Cali is a little to much, since some of those women are really men...
Yes. All one needs to do is walk along any beach in SoCal and it's no comparison.
Plus, it's easier to tell which one's are really women.
At least you have a 70% chance of landing in bed with a virgin in Utah. That's a great percentage if ya ask me?
Pac lagging behind in returning experience overall according to Phil Steele. Of course when the Pac also leads the nation in QB talent it doesn't mean the conference will be down overall. In fact there is no reliable measurement that corresponds to success in terms of experience.
Still, here's Steele's figures.
Team.............Lettermen returning..Lettermen lost..Total..Percent..Rank
Colorado...............57...........................18.............75.....76.00...18
...
Conference O line experience by number of games played:
North -
UW 124
Oregon 107
Cal 51
OSU 42
WSU 33
Stanford 15 (yikes lol)
South
Arizona 104
UCLA 88
ASU 60
Colorado 59
USC 53
Utah 46
Let's see, dumpy virgin or hot chick that knows how to please.
Decisions... decisions... decisions...
Steele has Oregon as #1 O line in the nation.
Oregon 5 returning starters on the lineWell sure, number of games of combined experience doesn't equal better. It does make you raise an eyebrow over Stanford's line, but that's about it. I do like the experience UW has on both lines. Neither are a concern of ours.
Oregon 5 returning starters on the line
Stanford 1 returning starter.