mrwallace2ku
Treehugger
- 38,407
- 4,614
- 293
- Joined
- May 15, 2013
- Hoopla Cash
- $ 200.00
^ Good job...lolz at the pizza joint being easier...I can't imagine the chaos that insues with a night out.
Nope, didn't make any assumptions and already called you out on it. Does saying it several times make it true?
You say the 7 more losses is obvious and no one argues with it and yet that's exactly what crimson was doing just before you wrote that.
And I made no rewrites of anything. I said adding more losses increases the chances of even the better teams getting one of those. That too should be painfully obvious and irrefutable and yet here we are having to keep repeating it because some of your fellow posters are a bit slow on it.
Of course I realize that, but I am not a BigXII fan puffing out my chest as if we decided to do that on purpose. That said, what you PAC guys are arguing can only truly be solved by playing all the teams. And, the BigXII is the only one doing that right now. Even though involuntary, they are the only league that can say our champion played every team in the league.You do realize that the only reason that they play a round robin is because they only have 10 teams in the conference and therefore cannot have a CCG, right?
Also, the PAC played a round robin schedule from 2006 until the conference expanded. Even after the conference expanded, the PAC kept it's 9 game IC schedule. When the Big 12 had 12 teams and could play a CCG, they played an 8 game IC schedule.
Either way, as a Longhorn fan, would rather pay full price to watch them play UCLA or Southeast Plano School of Cosmetology and Zoro-Astrian Studies?
Actually UCLA and Texas will be a neutral site game. I am not so blind to say Dallas is not an advantage for Texas, but technically it is a neutral site
Keep hanging your hat on the few teams that do that, and kudos to you for doing that. I know what it's like ... my Dawgs schedule OOC quite well.So this up coming season instead of playing Notre Dame and Fresno State at home and Boston College on the road you suggest we ask the AD to schedule Pomona College and St. Marys and UC Riverside all at home . Yeah , thanks for the suggestion but I'd rather (as would most USC fans ) poke my eye out than watch glorified scrimmage games just to pad the record and make a little more money for the school. Sad that you people actually put up with farce games like that and pathetic you actually count them as wins the same as USC going to Boston College or UCLA going to Texas.
This is utter nonsense. UGa dropped some games to the game with BSU. We lost, no question about it. But don't come at us about OOC ... you're picking on the wrong team.No, if you call Georgia, the SEC East Champ that year, getting humiliated by Boise State (in Atlanta!), who rose to #3 in the polls that year as a loss to the equivalent of an "FCS or Sun Belt" team, you are stupid beyond words.
Indeed, it proves why the SEC doesn't take on challenging games. If you play good teams instead of patty cakes, sometimes you get exposed. Georgia broke the SEC pattern by agreeing to several such contests. Our Bulldawg friends protested loudly. After Boise pulled a General Sherman on them, the UGA blogs were horrified that they took on such a trap game against a worthy opponent who came into town hungry and focused.
Nope, the SEC is back to what it has been doing now for a decade, make their non-conference schedules as easy as humanly possible.
Yes, it works, but it is cowardly. That isn't even debatable.
No, if you call Georgia, the SEC East Champ that year, getting humiliated by Boise State (in Atlanta!), who rose to #3 in the polls that year as a loss to the equivalent of an "FCS or Sun Belt" team, you are stupid beyond words.
Indeed, it proves why the SEC doesn't take on challenging games. If you play good teams instead of patty cakes, sometimes you get exposed. Georgia broke the SEC pattern by agreeing to several such contests. Our Bulldawg friends protested loudly. After Boise pulled a General Sherman on them, the UGA blogs were horrified that they took on such a trap game against a worthy opponent who came into town hungry and focused.
Nope, the SEC is back to what it has been doing now for a decade, make their non-conference schedules as easy as humanly possible.
Yes, it works, but it is cowardly. That isn't even debatable.
^ Good job...lolz at the pizza joint being easier...I can't imagine the chaos that insues with a night out.
Keep hanging your hat on the few teams that do that, and kudos to you for doing that. I know what it's like ... my Dawgs schedule OOC quite well.
This is utter nonsense. UGa dropped some games to the game with BSU. We lost, no question about it. But don't come at us about OOC ... you're picking on the wrong team.
^^^^^^ Hit the nail on the head. Yes the SEC gets teams higher ranked and into better bowl games because of the way they schedule but we all know it's cowardly. Alabama plays West Carolina or Western Carolina ( whichever is worse) the second to last game of the season when Pac 12 teams are playing rivals or conference rivals. Nice that a team as good as Alabama gets a practice right at the end of the season and gets to call it a game.
Well, the chaos is certainly there. My two older boys live with their Mom, so when they are up here on weekends the little boy freaks out and thinks its a party. And of course going out with his older brothers he really flips out. The two boys you met are from my wife. So that makes 4 boys total. Poor wife, She has me and 4 boys.... Last night she was out of it... She looked like she was in shock when Nolan was doing his happy scream throughout the evening.
And you can imagine how Mamba offspring @ age 13 and 16 can eat... Holy SHIT!
Ducks spring game was awesome. Oregon hasn't skipped a beat, easily see this team taking the PAC and legit natty contenders
2 dozen biscuits to go...
Bet those are gone by now...
I am sorry. But it makes a huge difference on this topic IMO. When I get my season tix in the mail I don't want to see 3 OOC cupcakes.
At least in conference cupcakes it is still a somewhat rivalry with a little history that leads to great game atmospheres.
Washington State, Cal... doesn't matter who it is. I take an extra in conference over a 3rd OOC fluff team.
It amazes me that you don't get it ... everyone else gets a pre-season to work out the kinks. The SEC starts IC play in week 1, playing many important IC games while most other teams are playing the OOC games getting warmed up. The SEC then has to have some OOC games at the end of the year and has chosen a week to do it, giving them what is basically a bye week. I would prefer 3 or 4 OOC games to start the season, but I don't get a vote. But you guys crying about this has really gotten tiresome when you don't acknowledge the lack of a pre-season, and the fact that at least 4 SEC teams finish the year with tough OOC grudge games.^^^^^^ Hit the nail on the head. Yes the SEC gets teams higher ranked and into better bowl games because of the way they schedule but we all know it's cowardly. Alabama plays West Carolina or Western Carolina ( whichever is worse) the second to last game of the season when Pac 12 teams are playing rivals or conference rivals. Nice that a team as good as Alabama gets a practice right at the end of the season and gets to call it a game.