Smed55
Well-Known Member
He was actually standing up for Snisher IMO, yes he mentions Sam but Sam was a piece involved in the trade he was talking about so it makes since that he references Sam, just like you have referenced him numerous times here in your post.
I honestly think it's time for us all to move on but I'm not sure if either of you two can.
Yep you are right yet again, Houston was a team in shambles, sorry but when you have the weapons that they had and you can't get them the ball, I'm thinking it's the QB's fault!
As far as me being enamoured with Sammie, try again, I'm done with him, I only make a comment when Coug or anyone else brings up some other asinine statement or reference to him!
Most of yiur last post was just a bunch of blah blah blah, said nothing!
You can say I keep bringing up Sammie all Yiu want, but the only time is when Ciug says something stupid about him and then Yiu have to back him up, because you are the Only one that does ? I used to think that Coug was actually Sam Bradford, I'm beginning to think youare Coug!
I'd be more than glad to heed what you said and quit talking about him, but maybe you and Coug should get together and you can tell him to give up the Sammie references, he is no longer with us, he is not our QB, he is irrelevant!
I enjoy almost every other posts that you make in here Vita, but your backing of Cougs views on this "bust" of a QB make no sense!
Most teams are screwed if they have to go to their backup QB for more than a few games. There are some exceptions of course but there is usually a good reason why these guys are backing up a starter in the NFL.
Pure speculation on your part, none of us can say one way or another what would or wouldn't have happened. To me this is about as lame as Coug stating if Sammie was healthy we would have won the Super Bowl last year. LOL!
Again, you two need to move on. One thing though, Coug is talking about the trade and your still stuck on 'woulda, coulda, shoulda'.
First of all your hate is strong. We traded a 7th rounder for Case, remember? That is the true measure of these guys for the now. And somehow you neglect the fact that Davis was pulled for a QB you think very little of in Hill. Just proves the point that Win/Loss isn't what dictates the value of a QB. Disagree, than why didn't the Rams sign Davis to a longer deal when they had a chance? They could have traded Davis away this off season since they obviously didn't value him over Hill? I'll tell you why, it's because he has no trade value, so his 'winning percentage' means squat!
I never compared these two, I only talked about Keenum's college since you said he had only one good year. This is what I mean by you being enamored with Sam. You can't get this guy out of your head! I said he beats out your boy Davis for the No. 2 spot.
Case having several great years in college was my orginal point when you said Case had 'a great year in college, when you compared him to Sam (The guy you can't stop thinking about and said all off season that he only had one good college season) saying they both had a great year in college.
Everybody knows that Case was thrown to the Wolves that year and Houston, who was expected to push for a SB that year, was in shambles that year. Both Case & the Vet Schaub struggled with that 2013 team. That team was a dumpster fire that season, put all the lipstick on that pig you want but you put too much value on winning and losing for the QB when it's actually a team stat.
Do what you must, I don't care but IMO we all just should move on.