All of our debates are sparked with you taking umbrage in my posts. It's quite clear Suh was the emotional leader of the team. You just argue with me to argue with me. Boring.
I don't have an issue agreeing with you, when I do. I think Suh was a leader on the defense, but emotional leader, I don't agree with. That is why I asked you what you felt an emotional leader is. If you don't want to answer -- No biggie.
I feel like Suh is an emotional leader. His emotion drive this defense. The Detroit News agrees.
It's time for Martha Ford to sell the Detroit Lions
"The team lost the emotional leader of its defense, Ndamukong Suh, and did little to replace him."
Lol this is exactly why I avoid you. We agree and you still want to argue.
I'm not trying to argue. I said I agree he was a leader on the defense. I was just wondering what you saw that makes you think he was an emotional leader on the defense?