Wazmankg
Half Woke Member
Dazed & Confused (1993)
An overrated romp. I’m glad I finally saw it but I wouldn’t care to watch it again.
B
Agreed. It was ok. But like Fast Times at Ridgemont High, it's reputation far exceeds its quality.
Dazed & Confused (1993)
An overrated romp. I’m glad I finally saw it but I wouldn’t care to watch it again.
B
Read the book. It's 25 times better than the movie!Watched "News of the World" with Tom Hanks last night. It was far better than I expected. Hanks was great in a western. Definitely worth the watch.
Very few movies are as good as the book(s). I allow that Lord of the Rings was damned close.Read the book. It's 25 times better than the movie!
I actually thought the Lord of the Rings movies were better than the books. J.R.R. Tolkien took so long to describe things in his near-endless run-on paragraphs that it made for headache-inducing reading.Very few movies are as good as the book(s). I allow that Lord of the Rings was damned close.
Totally agree with the Harry Potter movies. Spot on!I actually thought the Lord of the Rings movies were better than the books. J.R.R. Tolkien took so long to describe things in his near-endless run-on paragraphs that it made for headache-inducing reading.
I also thought the Harry Potter movies were pretty much the equal of the books.
The first True Grit movie varied quite a bit from the version that was serialized in magazine format, but was good in its own right (except for Glen Campbell's awful acting). The second version was a little truer to the book in some ways, but wasn't as good of a movie.
We watched The Producers (the original), To Kill a Mockingbird and The Hustler (also the original) last night... all 3 great flicks and obvious classics of their day. It's been a while since I'd watched any of them and while I enjoyed them all, The Hustler was the only one that really holds up 60 years down the road.
The original Producers is a complete classic.
I agree. It's hilarious.. Mostel, Wilder.. Dick Shawn. I've never even seen the remake. I just meant that some parts of it .. dialog, plot points, were somewhat dated.. same with To Kill a Mockingbird. The Hustler was not imo.. except for the fact that poolhalls are not as common as they were back then.
The new one is ok but not near as good. It was a lot easier to stretch the boundaries of good taste in the past.. .LOL.
Seriously. It probably couldn't be made today.
That's one of the things I agree with conservatives about. This most recent generation, not millenniels.. but whatever we're calling this generation after them, has ruined comedy.
I actually thought the Lord of the Rings movies were better than the books. J.R.R. Tolkien took so long to describe things in his near-endless run-on paragraphs that it made for headache-inducing reading.
I enjoyed the movies a great deal. I also enjoyed reading the books as well as they do provide a lot more detail. But yeah there are definite spots in the books where the story dragged. Tom Bodarialalala anyone?