- Thread starter
- #721
I have thought this over for a few weeks. My grade for the rebuild is:I was trying to come up with a grade to give the "Rebuild." There are some questions to answer before giving out a grade though.
Is the rebuild officially over?
When did it actually start?
Should it have started earlier and if it should have, should the timing be a part of the grade?
What are the parts of the rebuild that should be looked at to come up with a grade?
I think with the acquisition of four starting pitchers and plans to play veterans in LF does signal that the Rangers believe the rebuild is over.
I do believe the rebuild started several years too late, but I understand the thinking that didn't want to start it after the 2013 season like I personally wanted to happen. Even still it should have definitely started before it did. I think when the Rangers pursued Rendon that that showed they were not in rebuild mode at that time. When they couldn't land Rendon I think they finally realized they needed to rebuild. So, using that reasoning it seems the rebuild started in early 2020.
I think the draft, trades made, the development in the minors, and the use of young players are the most important things to consider in giving the rebuild a grade.
The draft has been a mixed bag for me. The 2021 draft netted us 2 good prospects from the top 4 picks. I think Cauley and Moller were terrible picks.
I liked getting Porter and Leiter last year, but I would have liked getting Termarr Johnson and the best guy available in the 4th round a lot better. I also would have liked to have traded for a comp pick. The fact that we signed two SS the year before when we were loaded with MIF prospects, and that keeping us from having a third round pick, is a negative factor as well.
The Gallo trade was an excellent one, but even that was lessened by signing two expensive free agents who blocked the two biggest prizes we got from that trade. The Gibson trade was just awful and needs no further explanation. There were some other lesser trades that helped. It remains to be seen what will be the long term effect of the Nate Lowe trade.
I do think the rebuild ended a year too early. We still have young guys to find out about and we will not be able to get a conclusive answer. Those include, but are not limited to, Dunning, Otto, Ragans, Smith, Duran, and Thompson.
The overuse of Calhoun and Miller last year kept us from finding out about some guys last year as well.
The development of some of our prospects over the last couple of years has been poor.
Those are the things I am thinking about when trying to come up with a grade. What am I missing?
And Garver has not had a good spring.Huff hit .308 this spring with an OPS of 1.025. When a guy hits like that, I don't care how many of the outs are strikeouts.
That is what we expected a year or so ago. Maybe this will be the year he puts it together.Huff hit .308 this spring with an OPS of 1.025. When a guy hits like that, I don't care how many of the outs are strikeouts.
Degoat doing his thing
Bubba has too much talent to not make this team. He must start hitting!Thompson needs to start hitting as does Garver
I guess-Leon is still on camp. Bochy is making the call. Maybe they just want him starting like Duran should. Would think a catcher could get 35% starts and some pinch hitsHuff hit .308 this spring with an OPS of 1.025. When a guy hits like that, I don't care how many of the outs are strikeouts.
It is spring but yeah they definitely like Garber over HuffHuff hit .308 this spring with an OPS of 1.025. When a guy hits like that, I don't care how many of the outs are strikeouts.