armadillooutlaw
Well-Known Member
Would you be disappointed with a starting rotation of Perez-Bassitt-Gray-Odorizzy-Dunning/Otto?I dream big LOL
JMO that's probably the most realistic outcome.
Would you be disappointed with a starting rotation of Perez-Bassitt-Gray-Odorizzy-Dunning/Otto?I dream big LOL
Would you be disappointed with a starting rotation of Perez-Bassitt-Gray-Odorizzy-Dunning/Otto?
JMO that's probably the most realistic outcome.
I think I would too. I think we should be able to get one of the top 4 guys. To me, Bassitt isn't good enough to give up a draft choice for. Also, he is going to be 34 before the season starts.Would you be disappointed with a starting rotation of Perez-Bassitt-Gray-Odorizzy-Dunning/Otto?
JMO that's probably the most realistic outcome.
I like that plan. I think I want 2 relievers either way though.If we got Senga and a guy to close and hopefully one more reliever. That would be great IMO
Or another SP less the secondary reliever. A lot of good progress this year pitching wise could easily happen
Yes. That will not make them much better than they were last year.Would you be disappointed with a starting rotation of Perez-Bassitt-Gray-Odorizzy-Dunning/Otto?
JMO that's probably the most realistic outcome.
I guess we can hope that he is aiming higher than some of the guys who have signed lately. I guess, there is always the chance they aren't looking to sign a reliever, but I sure hope that isn't the case.Trusting CY, but the RP market continues to be active without our involvement.
Would you be disappointed with a starting rotation of Perez-Bassitt-Gray-Odorizzy-Dunning/Otto?
JMO that's probably the most realistic outcome.
I guess we can hope that he is aiming higher than some of the guys who have signed lately. I guess, there is always the chance they aren't looking to sign a reliever, but I sure hope that isn't the case.
I guess we can hope that he is aiming higher than some of the guys who have signed lately. I guess, there is always the chance they aren't looking to sign a reliever, but I sure hope that isn't the case.
You are doing better than me then, because I can't see the logic of that kind of strategy.it's possible they are wanting to sort out the SP targets first. Not saying I agree with that strategy, but I understand the logic of it.
You are doing better than me then, because I can't see the logic of that kind of strategy.
I could see that possibly hindering them from signing a second reliever, but hopefully not the first one. Then again, you expect them to sign two expensive starting pitchers and I don't so maybe that is what is driving our difference in viewing how they can sign relievers.Financially. What they spend on SP could affect what they have to spend on RP.
I could see that possibly hindering them from signing a second reliever, but hopefully not the first one. Then again, you expect them to sign two expensive starting pitchers and I don't so maybe that is what is driving our difference in viewing how they can sign relievers.