- Thread starter
- #1,401
saddles
No More "Bullpen Failure"
Bradford and Englert looked much more ready than Kelly.Kelly is the guy he thinks we might lose. He looked raw in Frisco but his stuff is good if he can get it together
Bradford and Englert looked much more ready than Kelly.Kelly is the guy he thinks we might lose. He looked raw in Frisco but his stuff is good if he can get it together
Preparing for Rule 5 draft -- DGrades for CY thus far.
Bochy hire -- A
Odorizzy trade -- A+
Next up, is preparing for the Rule 5 draft. That grade comes tomorrow.
There is a major difference between Holland back in the day and Winn now. Holland had looked very, very good prior to coming up and Winn has looked bad.From Jeff Wilson:
Bullpen upgrades coming?
When Young was asked about the Rangers still being in the market for starting pitchers, he said the Rangers are looking to fill out their “pitching staff.”
That means bullpen help could be on the horizon.
The Rangers should bring back left-hander Matt Moore, who performed so well for them in 2022. In hindsight, with the way prices for relievers are soaring, the Rangers should have taken care of Moore during the season.
But the Rangers could be aiming higher, potentially for a closer.
Let’s just use Kenley Jansen as an example. I’m not saying the Rangers are interested in him, but he’s the first free-agent closer I thought of.
OK. The Rangers sign Jansen to a two-year deal. That means right-handers Jose Leclerc and Jonathan Hernandez become setup men any where from the sixth to eight inning. Moore fits in that group, and so does lefty Brock Burke.
Games just got shorter, and maybe there’s a setup man out there the Rangers can sign, too.
However, the Rangers’ are essentially going to have only eight 40-man players as real options to choose from the minors to start the season. The six prospects added to the 40-man Tuesday need more time in minors, though Winn could fill a valuable multple-innings role in his first stint in the majors.
It would be a similar play to what the Rangers did with Derek Holland in 2009. He was brought up to work as a reliever so that he could get a feel for big-league baseball in short spurs. .
The point, though, is if the six 40-man adds are going to stick, a few of them need to be of some service.
And the bullpen needs to be serviced.
How far into the 2023 season does Perez have to pitch like he did in 2022, to make folks stop thinking last year was a fluke?
I think he could do so through June and there would still be folks clamoring for the Rangers to trade for a better pitcher than him at the trade deadline.
A lot of people are expecting a lot more this year. Even this past year there were folks thinking we needed to trade for a better pitcher at the deadline. That is how I got started telling Newberg that Martin Perez says hello.not sure I understand that second part. I don't remember hearing a lot of people saying they needed to last year.
but for me, he doesn't need to duplicate 2022 entirely, but he needs to put up numbers close the whole way through.
If he ends up with an ERA around 3.50 and continues to be healthy I'll be very happy. I'm a believer that he's turned a corner. Whether he continues to perform like an ace or more like a very good #2 or #3 is the only question I have.How far into the 2023 season does Perez have to pitch like he did in 2022, to make folks stop thinking last year was a fluke?
I think he could do so through June and there would still be folks clamoring for the Rangers to trade for a better pitcher than him at the trade deadline.
A lot of people are expecting a lot more this year. Even this past year there were folks thinking we needed to trade for a better pitcher at the deadline. That is how I got started telling Newberg that Martin Perez says hello.
I just saw where the guy who has the Prospect Times account on Twitter said we still need to acquire a #1, a #2, and a #3. He seems to think Perez is a #4.
I do think part of the disrespect for Perez's 2022 performance from some Rangers fans is that they are overly enamored with big trades for pitchers to help the club. If they acknowlwdge just how great Perez was, it shoots holes in their argument that the Rangers have to make a big trade for pitching. Jamey Newberg seems to be in that category. He has a lot of company it seems.
I think that is one of the reasons some have a hard time with the Odorizzy trade. They think that trade could negate the need for a much bigger trade.
A lot of people are expecting a lot more this year. Even this past year there were folks thinking we needed to trade for a better pitcher at the deadline. That is how I got started telling Newberg that Martin Perez says hello.
I just saw where the guy who has the Prospect Times account on Twitter said we still need to acquire a #1, a #2, and a #3. He seems to think Perez is a #4.
I do think part of the disrespect for Perez's 2022 performance from some Rangers fans is that they are overly enamored with big trades for pitchers to help the club. If they acknowlwdge just how great Perez was, it shoots holes in their argument that the Rangers have to make a big trade for pitching. Jamey Newberg seems to be in that category. He has a lot of company it seems.
I think that is one of the reasons some have a hard time with the Odorizzy trade. They think that trade could negate the need for a much bigger trade.