This is a really good article.
This is a really good article.
I came up with Tuesday, but what's one day? LolThank you
I just looked at last years World Series date and the posts date.
Probably next Monday?
Would like to see something akin to salary floor. Want to see teams rewarded for playing well and not tanking. So like the olden days before Free agency where players played on same team for longer yearsNice read.
I’m all for the universal DH.
I’m ok with arbitration starting the 2nd year
One thing they can do for the service time manipulation is just round up. If a player plays/is on active 25 man roster in 90 games or more that should count as a full year.
Maybe make it to where players can become free agents after 6 years but also at the age of 29.5.
That way players can still hit the market at 27&28 and also so the avg player can hit the market going into his age 30 season to increase earnings so you don’t end up with players hitting the majors for half a year at 25 then half a year at 26 and hitting free agency going into their age 32 season, severely cutting their pay.
I'm with you on olden daysWould like to see something akin to salary floor. Want to see teams rewarded for playing well and not tanking. So like the olden days before Free agency where players played on same team for longer years
Like to see some fixes for bad umping
Fix the service time manipulation
Would like to see something akin to salary floor. Want to see teams rewarded for playing well and not tanking. So like the olden days before Free agency where players played on same team for longer years
Like to see some fixes for bad umping
Fix the service time manipulation
Tha's good. He hasn't had a good game in about a week it seems like.
I would favor contraction before a salary floor. Then, I am not a fan of revenue sharing either.Yes I agree with the salary floor.
If revenue sharing is going to be a thing then the teams should have a floor of at least $85 million.
I would favor contraction before a salary floor. Then, I am not sure fan of revenue sharing either.
Why, what is wrong with the way this season turned out? Who says only one or two teams can win or lose 100 games. We lost a lot of games and didn't tank one bit.It use to be rare to have 3+ teams win 100 games in a season. It happened only 5 times prior to 2017. Since 2017 it’s happened every year, except 2020 of course.
Too many 100 loss teams as well.
I’m not sure how they go about making it more competitive but they definitely need too.
Why, what is wrong with the way this season turned out? Who says only one or two teams can win or lose 100 games. We lost a lot of games and didn't tank one bit.
The Braves had an exciting season and so did many other teams.
I think real Rangers fans can look at our organization as a whole and like how our team is progressing. I have never been more excited about our future since about 11 years ago.
One thing that I would like to see is a balanced schedule. I want to get away from division heavy schedules.
They just need to find a Tim Bogar to hire and then they can ruin their draft pick.Yeah I guess more teams aren’t necessarily tanking, maybe we’re just seeing bigger fire sales at the deadline so after July 31st a few teams really take off and a few really start going down hill.. maybe that’s the cause?
I agree with the balanced schedule. I’m all in favor of less west coast games that start at 9.