sooner78wakeboard
Sooner Born, Sooner Bred
[ame]http://twitter.com/jnaj18/status/457640689245761536[/ame]
Actually the Big Ten allows unlimited Partial Qualifiers.
Funny how this Texas bashing thread turned into "well you only barely beat us all the time". Lets be honest, Nebraska is done as an elite program. They don't sit in a good recruiting base like USC, Bama, Texas, etc so they can't come back like those programs can. Add to the fact the Big ten will never let them recruit the brain dead thugs that Osborne built his great teams with, its over.
I find that hard to believe b/c the B1G is supposed to pride itself in academic excellence. I could have sworn the B1G allowed limited partial qualifiers. I'm too lazy to look it up so maybe a veteran B1G poster can inform us what the rule is on partial qualifiers in the B1G.
The Big Ten leaves it up to each school to decide for itself how it treats Partial Qualifiers. This, the BTN money, geographical and cultural similarities were the 'real' reasons UNL changed conferences.
I call bullshit Charlie. Ask any NU fan why Nebraska left for the BIG and it's all Texas's fault.....
I can tell a sports discussion has come to an end when someone brings up graduation rates or academics. smh
Big 10 « Oversigning.comBig 10 schools are required to establish a budget number for how many OFFERS they can give with an exception of no more than 3 over what they have room for under the 85 limit at any one time.
The Big Ten allows oversigning in football, up to 3. The school has to send a report to the conference offices justifying the action.
Big 10 « Oversigning.com
I think it does. The Big Ten supposedly doesn't allow oversigning(which you brought up) and yet allows exceptions to the rule. I call it being two-faced.
I notice you make a lot of allegations but never supply links. I'm done with you.
The dumb players actually attend Univeristy of Texas but somehow they are not called partial qualifiers.
The year the players started, GSR is how many graduate in six years. SIX YEARS!!! At Texas, a football players is guaranteed to graduate around 50% of the time, in SIX YEARS!!!!!
2000 GSR Graduation Success Rate
Nebraska 83%
Texas 42%
2001
Nebraska 78%
Texas 51%
2002
Nebraska 72%
Texas 53%
2003
Nebraska 68%
Texas 49%
2004
Nebraska 67%
Texas 58%
2005
Nebraska 68%
Texas 58%
2006 GSR Graduation Success Rate
Nebraska 76%
Texas 56%
Nebraska Academic All Americans 310
Texas Academic All Americans 126
In other news, Vince Young earned his degree in 2013 in Applied Learning and Development. Matter of fact, a LOT of the Texas athletes MAJOR In that. Applied Learning and Development must be for people to work at Daycare facilities because in the University of Texas Course Catalog it specifically states this
Applied Learning and Development "which does not lead to teacher certification."
From that I conclude that they are NOT TEACHERS, maybe janitors.
NEBRASKA will never be the same without the Prop players.
It was well known amongst the coaches that Nebraska had an open admission policy under Osborne.
All the Texas hatred started with the Longhorns insistence on full qualifiers.
Nebraska wanted PQs. Texas did not. Texas won the debate 11-1 in the Big 12 voting.
Nebraska doesn't have enough talent in state.
And they cannot get elite sunbelt athletes to come to a cold weather plains state.
The PQ angle was their ace in the hole recruiting niche.
In fairness, Nebraska did an amazing and commendable thing with these guys.
Society might have turned their backs on some, but Nebraska embraced them and elevated them.
Nebraska deserves all the credit for doing an amazing job with PQs.
It was a good thing to do.
But, without the PQs, Nebraska is simply not going to ever be the same program again.
Texas graduation rates by players is not very good, but will get better under Charley Strong, I'm sure. He meets with the education people once a week; Mack met with them three times in 15 years.
It is also a fact, that it is a little harder to get a degree at UT.
Per several lists on the interwebz, looked at graduation rates for state universities. Texas is #22. I've not found Nebraska's yet. However, they were NOT in the bottom 25, so that's good.
Univ of Nebraska at Lincoln
Grad rates: at 150% equals 64% at 100% equals 29% Median SAT score 1150
Univer of Texas at Austin
Grad rates: at 150% equals 80% at 100% equals 53% Median SAT score 1240
So, for the student body, there is a higher SAT score needed for UT, and the graduation rates are higher than Nebraska's.
Now, I don't really think this means a damn thing about the football teams of each school. So you should probably quit bringing up this academic shit. Because, academically, UT will beat Nebraska.
But it is you Texans that bring up how dumb Nebraska football players are. Please read this thread, JohnDyer and texasExes both mention it but supply no support. I merely point out the Texas athletes(note there is no mention of student) are not very bright and back it up by linking the NCAA Graduation Success rates. Heck, Texas baseball has been on academic probation in the last five years and LOST scholarships for poor academics.
As for overall academic institutions, there is absolutely no doubt Texas is better than Nebraska. Show me where I have EVER stated otherwise. I did not attend Nebraska myself.
But I will gladly argue technicalities with Texans that get their panties bunched up when the facts they think they are presenting actually look worse when applied to the Longhorns.