BINGO
New Member
Nicks is indeed a better receiver than Crabtree. However, it is not by a great margin as some of you are making it out to be. The gap between them is not steep at all. As a matter of fact trading Nicks for Crabtree would only be viewed by most NFL evaluator as a lateral move. Crabtree would be regarded as a reliable weapon playing along side Peyton Manning, whereas Nicks would then be viewed as an "underachier" playing in our offense. Reason for this is because the success that one receives out of the WR position is dependent or should I say intrinsically ties into the type of player such receive has as his QB. For example look at Reggie Wayne, both Steve Smiths, Deion Branch, Laurent Robinson, Brandon Marshall, etc. There's always seems to be an independent variable in place which is their QB.Even if Eli only had one great WR, that's one more than we have at this point.
Manningham is nothing special! I never put much faith in him with regard to him being a legit weapon for Alex Smith. There was legitimate reason why in the SB coach Belichick gameplan was to lure Manning to only have to go to Mario. Belichick knew that Manningham is the "weak link" in that offense. Sh8the only real reason why were were able to escape defeat from the Giants game (regular season game - our first meeting with them) was because of Manningham stone hands. Had he hauled in that long pass from Manning, we would have lost that game. Giants let him walk for a piece of a butter roll, and refused to resign him. Jenkins has proven nothing, and the same goes to Ruben Randle - but watch closely who will pose a bigger threat for their respective offense in 2012. Is it really our talent evaluators fault that have missed out on players (1st round pick Nicks vs. Crabtree)?! Or is it the coaching staff inept skills in developing our players (3rd round picks Jason Hill & Brandon williams vs. Manningham); (6th round pick or later - Ronald Johnson, Kyle Williams, Vs. Victor Cruz). Maybe it really is isn't about the independent varialbe (quarterback position) but rather coaching and a GM/scouting issue in terms evaluating skills.We have no idea what we're getting with Moss, you just dismissed Manningham as being nothing special with Manning, Crabtree hasn't done anything special in the NFL, Jenkins has proven nothing, James has proven nothing. . .
I'll take them over Jake Ballard and Brandon Jacobs.Gore and Davis are our only two established, not over the hill, weapons.
I wouldn't! People are seriously underrating our skill players:Would you trade our skill position players for Dallas'? I would in a heart beat.
Gore > Felix Jones
Crabtree < Dez Bryant
Davis > Jason Whitten
Williams < Miles Austin
Walker > John Phillips
Ginn = Kevin Ogletree
Well, it appears to me that we got them beat 3 to 2, with one tie. And honestly that one particular tie favors us more b/c Ginn is more of an impact since he is widely considered a true special teams weapon in the league.
He certainly is not the concensus top ten at his position. People are still holding on to his past as if he is still dominating the game today. You can make a case for it that he ranks # 10, but that's being modest on his behalf:Gates isn't in the top 10 at his position?
1.) Vernon Davis
2.) Rob Gronkowski
3.) Jimmy Williams
4.) Jason Whitten
5.) Jermichael Finley
6.) Aaron Hernendez
7.) Jermaine Gresham
8.) Brandon Pettigrew
9.) Tony Gonzalez
10.) Antonio Gates / Dallas Clark / Jared Cook / Brent Celek / Owen Daniels / Zach Miller / Greg Olsen
Gates past skewed your opinion in believing that he is still the Gates of 2005. Simply put, he's lucky that he's involved with Rivers in a TE friendly offense such as Norv's. He was never a "great" in line blocker, and with his diminishing skills as a receiver, I don't see how anyone can rank him in the top ten.
A great majority of NFL receivers do not have a top 10 NFL receiver to throw passes to. So tell me...which WR is a top 10 for Eli, Rivers (when Jax was injured), Newton, Vick, Sanchez, etc.Which WR do we have that's a top 10 WR?
Provide me with your list of top 20, and I'll be better equipped to answer that question.Do we have a top 20?
Provide me with your list of top 30, and I'll be better equipped to answer that question.Top 30?
This is BLASPHEMY!! Of course he is, and that's not even up for a debate. There has been supported evidence (emperical research) over the years that have shown that Gore faces the most 8-man front than any other back in the league. Yet he still manages to find ways to produce on a yearly basis. Between Peterson, and Gore there's no other backs in the league that could compare to the amount of attention he receives from opposing coaches (maybe is has to do with the lack of talent each player has from their respective QBs)? I don't know they stack the box and dare us to throw passes instead.Is Gore still a top 10 RB? You could make a case for him, but if he is top 10, it's barely. I wouldn't say he's top 7 (Peterson, McCoy, Forte, MJD, Rice, Foster, Turner). He's in a class with Lynch, McFadden (due to injuries), Steven Jackson, Fred Jackson and Rashad Mendenhall.
Again, thanks for indirectly supporting my argument. Edwards had produced pretty well playing alongside Sanchez. He clearly isn't the problem. I already addressed the Crabtree situation. Ginn...IMO is probably the most unlucky receiver in the NFL. It is clearly that he isn't fit to be a # 1 receiver, but as a potent # 2 receiver, the guy has the skill set to that. What he lacks in toughness, and hands he makes up for it in route precision and pure speed. Ask Revis: .And let's not start praising our OL for having a bunch of first round picks. Our offense last season had three WRs that were top 10 picks (Edward, Ginn, Crabtree) and a TE taken in the top 10 as well with a first overall QB throwing to them. That didn't make it good.
I wonder how many other offenses in the league had 3-4 former top ten receivers on their squad? It's really ashame someone like Bradford doesn't have 3 to 4 former top ten picks at his disposal.
Last edited by a moderator: